Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IgorFobia
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 6

    #1

    Sequencing the same part: how many possible way?

    Hi,

    I don't know a lot about sequencing, my question should be trivial but I cannot find the answer on the web...

    Suppose that a genome contains a certain sequence, like AGTACATGG.

    My question is: if I sequence this genome, in how many possible ways can this sequence be represented in my data? Does it depend on the sequencing platform?

    Here is the list of all the potential possibilities, as far as I can think:

    1: "original"
    AGTACATGG

    2: reverse complement
    CCATGTACT

    3: complement
    TCATGTACC

    4: reverse
    GGTACATGT

    Thank you very much for your help!
  • fkrueger
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 627

    #2
    There is a convention that DNA in biological data is always represented in a 5' to 3' orientation. Thus, you will only come across your original sequence and its reverse complement, but not the other two cases.

    Comment

    • IgorFobia
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 6

      #3
      Thank you for your very fast answer.

      So we know the 5' to 3' orientation even for sequenced (not annotated) reads, don't we?

      Comment

      • krobison
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 734

        #4
        Yes, the chemistry for all of the sequencing approaches in current use always proceed directionally.

        As a historical note, with the original Maxam-Gilbert sequencing method it was possible to read both 5'->3' and 3'->5'. I had the misfortune as a 1st year graduate student to not know this & wonder why an entire cosmid worth of bacterial data had absolutely no open reading frames that looked like anything in the world (indeed, it seemed to be very sparse on long open reading frames). Then it occurred to the person who gave me the data to mention that it needed reversing first.

        During the completion of the E.coli genome, Blattner's group at U. Wisonsin discovered one piece of E.coli sequence in Genbank which simply didn't match their data. They checked & indeed the original sequence had been Maxam-Gilbert and was deposited in Genbank backwards (no, I was not the depositor!).

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...