Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mgravina
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 10

    5' versus 3' barcoding

    Hello all. Can anyone offer insight into the pros and cons of placing index barcodes at the 5' versus the 3' end of the read?
  • epistatic
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 129

    #2
    5' of the read allows you to run multiplexed samples without doing the index read. I liked to do this on the GAII to avoid using the Paired-End module for SR multiplexing. Con is that the bases need to be balanced or you can throw off the cluster calling algorithms. Use cycle 5+ to avoid this type of problem.

    3' end of read must mean the standard Illumina indexing method using a second priming and read to hit the index. That method works fine, extra reagents are in the SBS kits to allow for 7 cycles for the index read. Illumina only has 12-indexes for DNA and RNA out so far, so that would be a con. On the HiSeq this indexing read is easy to set up, I avoided it on the GAII.

    Comment

    • mgravina
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks for the info!

      Comment

      • NextGenSeq
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 482

        #4
        Bioo has 48 barcodes using the 3' method. The kit works well.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Today, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...