Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zshuhua
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 4

    FastQC: odd kmer content

    Hi,
    I'm checking the data quality using fastqc for the Illumina Hi-Seq2000 reads and got odd kmer patterns (see attachment). Although an old thread suggested that 5' pattern is common, I want to know how to eliminate the odd patterns for GGGGG, AAAAA and TCTTC. Could you please help to interpret and get rid of them?
    Thanks in advance!
    Attached Files
  • Jeremy
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 190

    #2
    TRIMMOMATIC, or any other read cleaning program, should clean those up. I would use options: SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 HEADCROP:15 MINLEN:36
    Then run FastQC again and you should see a much nicer report, if you are just mapping to a reference genome then cleaning reads is less of an issue so you could leave out the HEADCROP (which cuts bases from the start). But if you are assembling de-novo then I would cut that non-random sequence at the start.

    Comment

    • zshuhua
      Junior Member
      • May 2010
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks for your help!
      I intend to calculate genes/transcripts expression levels. Do I have to cut the 5' 10 bp?
      I'm wondering what causes the patterns of for GGGGG, AAAAA and TCTTC, because I saw those patterns in other tens of RNA-seq data files.

      Comment

      • Jeremy
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 190

        #4
        Like I said, you only need to cut if doing a de-novo assembly because the non-randomness of the start of the reads could cause problems in assembly, if just aligning to a genome then the read should align anyway. The non-randomness of the start is usually caused by the 'random' primers used to make cDNA. The stretch of Gs or As are either bad quality reads or legitimate stretches of repeats that happened to get sequenced, either way the SLIDINGWINDOW option seems to remove them.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        102 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        123 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        114 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...