Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ariannigna
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 3

    single end seq

    Hello from London!
    I'm planning a project of whole exome sequencing on human samples.
    We bought the 2.1M Nimblegen array and are going to seq on GAII.
    the library is based on a single end sequencing
    I have to decide the read lenght with the GAII but I don't understand how it'll affect the coverage.
    With a single end is it better to have short (36bp) or long (75bp)read lenght?
  • Xi Wang
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 317

    #2
    Originally posted by ariannigna View Post
    Hello from London!
    I'm planning a project of whole exome sequencing on human samples.
    We bought the 2.1M Nimblegen array and are going to seq on GAII.
    the library is based on a single end sequencing
    I have to decide the read lenght with the GAII but I don't understand how it'll affect the coverage.
    With a single end is it better to have short (36bp) or long (75bp)read lenght?
    The mappability of short reads and long reads are different. Longer reads will have more percentage of reads that can be uniquely mapped to the reference genome.
    Xi Wang

    Comment

    • ariannigna
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 3

      #3
      thanks for you reply.
      so if I decide to go for the single end seq and a short read lenght I should end up with higher coverage ... but higher chance to miss indels and duplication?

      Comment

      • Xi Wang
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 317

        #4
        When a short read map back to the reference genome, there would be more than one loci that the short read hits. This is due to the sequence repeat of a genome. Also you can refer to the UCSC track "mappability":

        Xi Wang

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        99 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        120 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        113 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...