Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Teunis
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 2

    Exercises

    Dear,
    I have been exercising in bioinformatics on the Rosalind web site
    The problems learned me a lot.
    The last problem I solved was assembling a circular (bacterial) genome.
    The input were about 600 reads of 50 bp. The correct answer I obtained (in 20 sec, cheap computer) was a sequence of about 2000 bp. I program with the language PASCAL because it gives me a lot of freedom to construct my own data structure.
    The problem is that I can't get another (bigger) dataset to give my algoritm a try.
    Is someone willing to give me a dataset of reads and verify my answer?
    Reads of circular DNA or contigs of DNA from eukaryotic cells are welcome.
    The reads can be of mixed lengths and (almost) perfect.
    Please, let me know if I can expect an answer in the SEQanswer community.
    Thanks for reading
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Teunis,

    You can certainly download reference genomes from ncbi:

    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/

    The files you want will end with "fna". They are mostly 2.5 to 5 million bp. If you want something smaller, you can just open them with a text editor and just keep the first 1000 lines or so. Then you can use a tool like randomreads.sh (packaged with BBTools) to generate random reads of whatever quality, quantity, or length you want.

    In Linux, the command would be something like this:

    randomreads.sh ref=ecoli.fna out=reads.fq reads=100000 length=600 maxq=40 midq=35 minq=30

    You can verify your answer with a program called "Quast".

    Comment

    • Teunis
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2014
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks I will give it a try. Bye Bye

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...