Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rkawa
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 5

    #1

    Fewer reads in the middle of some exons

    Hi everyone,

    I have encountered somewhat unique issue in one of my collaborators samples and would like to hear your input/thoughts.

    1. Reads in the middle of some exons are lower in one set of samples (triplicates).
    2. This happens pretty randomly in many exons but not in UTRs.
    3. It is not observed in short exons.
    4. Library was made at the same time with other samples.
    5. All samples were spread in several lanes to avoid batch effect during sequencing.
    6. Reads were aligned with STAR
    7. Seems to appear too often to consider alternative splicing/differential exon usage
    8. In the example attached, the bottom two have fewer reads in the middle of snap25 exon.

    Thanks for reading and appreciate your help!
    Attached Files
    Last edited by rkawa; 07-01-2014, 10:25 AM.
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    Have you tried a different aligner?

    Could this be a repetitive element or highly-variable region that might be misassembled or have different copy count / structure in different individuals? A single SNP could change the mapping from one location to a highly similar location. Also, what is the mapping quality of reads in these areas compared to other areas?

    Is there a known pseudogene related to this gene?

    Comment

    • rkawa
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 5

      #3
      Hi Brian,
      Thanks for quick reply. I haven't tried different aligner. SNP is unlikely because these are all mouse samples from the same genetic background. Mapping quality of the reads are generally good (uniquely mapped reads ~80%, unmapped ~0%). There aren't any mismatches in the regions in question. Happens fairly frequently in many genes in this sample but not the others. It is not repetitive sequences which have this phenomena.

      Thanks

      Riki

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Yesterday, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      71 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...