Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ppbto
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 1

    Hello I'm from Mexico

    I'm a masters student of biochemical sciences.

    I have some questions: is posible know the genome size by NGS? and if it's posible how much do you need to sequence to have a good estimate?
  • lcollado
    Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 65

    #2
    Hello ppbto,

    You should ask your question in the bioinformatics forum instead of the Introductions one. Anyhow, as I understand it your question is:

    Is it possible to estimate the genome size only by using HTS data? If it is possible, what sequencing depth do you need to obtain an accurate estimate? 2x? 4x?

    Greetings,
    Leo
    L. Collado Torres, Ph.D. student in Biostatistics.

    Comment

    • lcollado
      Member
      • Jun 2009
      • 65

      #3
      Hello again,

      Check the paper on the Panda genome http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08696 . It doesn't answer your question completely, but it's a start.

      To assess genome coverage of the assembled contigs and scaffolds,
      we first estimated the genome size of the panda. To obtain the best
      estimate, we used sequencing depth, size ratio of syntenic blocks, and
      comparison of C-values. Using 17-base oligonucleotides and their
      frequency distribution in the usable sequencing reads to determine
      sequencing depth11, we obtained an estimated panda genome size of
      2.46 Gb (Supplementary Fig. 8). Given the presence of sequencing
      errors, we expect that the sequencing depth is underestimated, and
      consequently the panda genome size should be slightly smaller than
      2.46 Gb.
      Greetings,
      Leo
      L. Collado Torres, Ph.D. student in Biostatistics.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...