Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mamoon Rashid
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 8

    Next generation data analysis and assembly

    Hi All,
    Its just as introduction to me.
    I am Mamoon, a newbie in NGS data analysis and assembly field. I am working as a Postdoc in King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. We have a good sequencing platforms here ranging from solexa to 454 to SOLID.
    My first question is that how to choose one among these technologies for sequencing different organisms (like bacteria, eukaria etc.) and different samples (for e.g. genomic DNA, RNA).
    Thanks
  • michael_0214
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 5

    #2
    Hi, my Name is michael. I am working on the matter of next-geration sequence assembly for about one year. And two articles are recommended for your question:1. Assembly Algorithms for Next-generation Sequencing Data; 2. Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data.

    Comment

    • Mamoon Rashid
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 8

      #3
      Does anybody know how to identify uniquely mapped paired-end reads to the reference using BWA. Is this information exctracted after generating SAM file? please post with adequate details.
      Thanks in anticipation

      Comment

      • wwq413
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 6

        #4
        To Mamoon Rashid,
        yes, you need extract after SAM file.
        below is what i used: I selected paired end reads with both ends mapped or one end mapped
        awk '{if (($1 ~/^@/) || ($2 !=77) && ($2 !=141)) print}' $path/pe2.bwa.sam | samtools view -bT $path/superref.fasta - >$path/pe2.bwa.bam

        I just used this method to publish a paper
        Wang W, Messing J (2011) High-Throughput Sequencing of Three Lemnoideae (Duckweeds) Chloroplast Genomes from Total DNA. PLoS ONE 6(9):
        e24670. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024670
        You can have a quick review.
        wwq

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...