Originally posted by genomeseeker
View Post
(1) Stop run. (Actually there are 3 options when you stop the run. I think you don't want option 1 unless the lab is burning down or something.)
(2) Exit HCS.
(3) Turn off (power down) the HiSeq! Yes, actually reach around the left side of the instrument and depress the rocker switch such that the instrument powers down.
(4) Power down the computer. I do this from the Vista start menu "shutdown" -- but there is a caveat. For reasons I don't understand, our shutdown button from this menu defaults to "standby". So to speed things up you want to not press that button but go to the dropdown menu just to the right of it and choose "shut down".
(5) Wait 5 minutes. (Probably not necessary, but why not?)
(6) Power up computer, log in to your normal user account. You may have mount/login to network drives, etc. Normal startup procedure for the computer.
(7) Wait until the "do not eject" (or is it "do not remove") drive appears. This can take a bit -- several minutes. If it doesn't happen, reboot the computer. I have never had this drive not appear the second time.
(8) Then launch HCS. You will probably have to re-seat the flowcells and possibly mop up some liquid around the gaskets.
(9) Resume the run.
You definitely want to do this during hours when tech support is available.
I am still hazy on what protocol would be if you have one flowcell running for several days and then want to add another flowcell and start a run. I mean, you need to do a maintenance wash on the 2nd flowcell fluidics, right? So you what, stop the first run, then start a maintenance wash on the second flowcell, then add your reagents and flowcell and start the new run?
That is pretty much what we did. But it seemed to invariable lead to that RTA slow down that is described here. Also, unless we went through the instrument power cycle, we would get some strange communication error between the instrument and the computer that would cause the focus to be off for the remaining swaths of the current cycle of the first flowcell.
By the way, I don't think we ever saw this issue with the old "death wish RAID" (RAID0) data drive configuration we had pre-HiSeq2500 upgrade. Correlation does not imply causation, though. I don't see a reason the new RAID5 configuration would not be superior in most ways.
We just installed a new version of HCS2.0.10 before our most recent run. This is supposed to ameliorate many of these sorts of issues.
--
Phillip
Leave a comment: