Originally posted by M4TTN
View Post
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Interesting idea.Originally posted by GenoMax View PostPerhaps they are using slower flows to use relatively less reagents. Patent linked in #18.
This is analogous to "Intel's" business strategy. Release just enough "innovation" to remain a comfortable step ahead of competitors.
Indeed, the relative lack of competition in both CPUs and NGS is a concern for those doing research on a limited budget.
I'd like to see someone reverse engineer a flowcell and compete on reagent costs, but I doubt it will happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Perhaps they are using slower flows to use relatively less reagents. Patent linked in #18.Originally posted by M4TTN View PostDoes fatter lanes = more reagents = more expensive per run?
This is analogous to "Intel's" business strategy. Release just enough "innovation" to remain a comfortable step ahead of competitors.Originally posted by M4TTN View PostIt also suggests massive potential for improved performance over time (by increasing cluster density).Last edited by GenoMax; 01-15-2014, 04:21 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Does fatter lanes = more reagents = more expensive per run?Originally posted by BBoy View PostSee flowcell pics on Twitter @nextgenseek
Fat lanes = different optics
Probably not a typo
It also suggests massive potential for improved performance over time (by increasing cluster density).
We just received a refurb MiSeq in December 2013, so I'm somewhat dismayed by the NextSeq500 release. However 250k is well out of budget.
One wonders if the MiSeq will still get improvements. I notice from the HiSeqX spec sheet that they are now using ordered arrays. I wonder how much of an improvement this could yield on the MiSeq, which already has a very high cluster density.
The two things I'd really like to see is MiSeq hit 100M clusters and the cost of reagents per run to halve.
Leave a comment:
-
See flowcell pics on Twitter @nextgenseekOriginally posted by M4TTN View PostInterested to see that the cluster density specs are an order of magnitude lower on the 500 than the MiSeq. Is that an error?
Quote from Illumina:
(http://www.illumina.com/systems/next...fications.ilmn)
* Install specifications based on Illumina PhiX control library at supported cluster densities (between 129 and 165 k/mm² clusters passing filter). Actual performance parameters may vary based on sample type, sample quality, and clusters passing filter.
Fat lanes = different optics
Probably not a typo
Leave a comment:
-
New patent on the exclusion amplification for the X. http://bit.ly/1j6sSll
Just transport the dna fragments slowly and amplify quickly.
Leave a comment:
-
Spec Sheet from ILMN:Originally posted by aeonsim View PostWhat I'd like is some more detailed explanation of the 2-dye system the NextSeq 500 is using. I assume they provide C & A tagged with Red, T & A tagged with green & G untagged, thus C should be pure Red, T pure green and A ~ a 50:50 mix of green & red (orange) and G then undyed...
http://bit.ly/1iOYN7e
Leave a comment:
-
Illumina announces $1,000 genome
??
"The cost of sequencing a human genome has at last been brought below $1,000, DNA sequencing giant Illumina said Tuesday. Crossing that barrier opens to door to bringing the public the full benefit of 21st-century genomic medicine."
via hacker news ... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7060021
Leave a comment:
-
Interested to see that the cluster density specs are an order of magnitude lower on the 500 than the MiSeq. Is that an error?
Quote from Illumina:
(http://www.illumina.com/systems/next...fications.ilmn)
* Install specifications based on Illumina PhiX control library at supported cluster densities (between 129 and 165 k/mm² clusters passing filter). Actual performance parameters may vary based on sample type, sample quality, and clusters passing filter.
Leave a comment:
-
What I'd like is some more detailed explanation of the 2-dye system the NextSeq 500 is using. I assume they provide C & A tagged with Red, T & A tagged with green & G untagged, thus C should be pure Red, T pure green and A ~ a 50:50 mix of green & red (orange) and G then undyed...
Leave a comment:
-
The rep at PAG said they planned on selling 4 "X boxes" in 2014--and had already sold 3 30 minutes after the announcement.
The NextSeq500 is clearly aimed at people considering a Proton. Same price, same emphasis on speed, better stats right now. I don't like that the only single-end mode is 75 bp. Lots of people like the 150 bp read on the 2500 Rapid. And the other downside is that all 4 lanes (100M reads each) get fed the same library, so doesn't improve flexibility in flow of projects at a facility. But a nice mid-machine.
Leave a comment:
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Genome Sequencing Reveals Large, Repeat-Rich DNA in Trapdoor Spider Named for Stephen Colbert
by SEQadmin2
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:57 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 09:51 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
|
Leave a comment: