Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geneus
    replied
    Originally posted by M4TTN View Post

    It also suggests massive potential for improved performance over time (by increasing cluster density).
    Maybe more "headspace" by driving scanning/optics?

    Leave a comment:


  • M4TTN
    replied
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    Perhaps they are using slower flows to use relatively less reagents. Patent linked in #18.


    This is analogous to "Intel's" business strategy. Release just enough "innovation" to remain a comfortable step ahead of competitors.
    Interesting idea.

    Indeed, the relative lack of competition in both CPUs and NGS is a concern for those doing research on a limited budget.

    I'd like to see someone reverse engineer a flowcell and compete on reagent costs, but I doubt it will happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by M4TTN View Post
    Does fatter lanes = more reagents = more expensive per run?
    Perhaps they are using slower flows to use relatively less reagents. Patent linked in #18.
    Originally posted by M4TTN View Post
    It also suggests massive potential for improved performance over time (by increasing cluster density).
    This is analogous to "Intel's" business strategy. Release just enough "innovation" to remain a comfortable step ahead of competitors.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 01-15-2014, 04:21 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    I hope illumina will reconsider "10 to a pack" decision for X in future (there can't be more than a handful customers at that level and 3 are already on board).

    More than a handful places can use one (or two) X's.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 01-15-2014, 04:15 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dfhdfh
    replied
    Originally posted by SNPsaurus View Post
    The rep at PAG said they planned on selling 4 "X boxes" in 2014--and had already sold 3 30 minutes after the announcement.
    That is insane.

    Leave a comment:


  • M4TTN
    replied
    Originally posted by BBoy View Post
    See flowcell pics on Twitter @nextgenseek
    Fat lanes = different optics
    Probably not a typo
    Does fatter lanes = more reagents = more expensive per run?

    It also suggests massive potential for improved performance over time (by increasing cluster density).

    We just received a refurb MiSeq in December 2013, so I'm somewhat dismayed by the NextSeq500 release. However 250k is well out of budget.

    One wonders if the MiSeq will still get improvements. I notice from the HiSeqX spec sheet that they are now using ordered arrays. I wonder how much of an improvement this could yield on the MiSeq, which already has a very high cluster density.

    The two things I'd really like to see is MiSeq hit 100M clusters and the cost of reagents per run to halve.

    Leave a comment:


  • BBoy
    replied
    Originally posted by M4TTN View Post
    Interested to see that the cluster density specs are an order of magnitude lower on the 500 than the MiSeq. Is that an error?

    Quote from Illumina:
    (http://www.illumina.com/systems/next...fications.ilmn)
    * Install specifications based on Illumina PhiX control library at supported cluster densities (between 129 and 165 k/mm² clusters passing filter). Actual performance parameters may vary based on sample type, sample quality, and clusters passing filter.
    See flowcell pics on Twitter @nextgenseek
    Fat lanes = different optics
    Probably not a typo

    Leave a comment:


  • AllSeq
    replied
    Originally posted by GW_OK View Post
    Called it! Called it!

    Holy sh_!

    "NextSeq"
    I think you mean "Nailed it!" - really good call!

    Leave a comment:


  • SNPsaurus
    replied
    New patent on the exclusion amplification for the X. http://bit.ly/1j6sSll

    Just transport the dna fragments slowly and amplify quickly.

    Leave a comment:


  • ECO
    replied
    Originally posted by aeonsim View Post
    What I'd like is some more detailed explanation of the 2-dye system the NextSeq 500 is using. I assume they provide C & A tagged with Red, T & A tagged with green & G untagged, thus C should be pure Red, T pure green and A ~ a 50:50 mix of green & red (orange) and G then undyed...
    Spec Sheet from ILMN:
    http://bit.ly/1iOYN7e

    Leave a comment:


  • bilyl
    replied
    Originally posted by GW_OK View Post
    Called it! Called it!

    Holy sh_!

    "NextSeq"
    Looks like I'll have to eat my hat! Exciting news!

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard Finney
    replied
    Illumina announces $1,000 genome

    ??



    "The cost of sequencing a human genome has at last been brought below $1,000, DNA sequencing giant Illumina said Tuesday. Crossing that barrier opens to door to bringing the public the full benefit of 21st-century genomic medicine."

    via hacker news ... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7060021

    Leave a comment:


  • M4TTN
    replied
    Interested to see that the cluster density specs are an order of magnitude lower on the 500 than the MiSeq. Is that an error?

    Quote from Illumina:
    (http://www.illumina.com/systems/next...fications.ilmn)
    * Install specifications based on Illumina PhiX control library at supported cluster densities (between 129 and 165 k/mm² clusters passing filter). Actual performance parameters may vary based on sample type, sample quality, and clusters passing filter.

    Leave a comment:


  • aeonsim
    replied
    What I'd like is some more detailed explanation of the 2-dye system the NextSeq 500 is using. I assume they provide C & A tagged with Red, T & A tagged with green & G untagged, thus C should be pure Red, T pure green and A ~ a 50:50 mix of green & red (orange) and G then undyed...

    Leave a comment:


  • SNPsaurus
    replied
    The rep at PAG said they planned on selling 4 "X boxes" in 2014--and had already sold 3 30 minutes after the announcement.

    The NextSeq500 is clearly aimed at people considering a Proton. Same price, same emphasis on speed, better stats right now. I don't like that the only single-end mode is 75 bp. Lots of people like the 150 bp read on the 2500 Rapid. And the other downside is that all 4 lanes (100M reads each) get fed the same library, so doesn't improve flexibility in flow of projects at a facility. But a nice mid-machine.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:57 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...