Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fanauh2o
    replied
    I tried around 2 ng using the Illumina v2 kit. The key is that you need to make sure you can see the 18S and 28S bands on the picochip when running the bioanalzyer.

    Leave a comment:


  • jvanfleet
    replied
    Hello Guy,

    I came across your post about working with 1-5 ng of total RNA and wanted to let you know about the Epicentre kit called TotalScript.

    Here is some info and links:


    •Total RNA input, rRNA removal not required.
    •Produces directional libraries.
    •One day procedure utilizing only 1-5 ng of total RNA.
    •Index-capable. (TotalScript™ Index Kit sold separately.)
    •Ideal for high quality RNA (RIN >7) from human, rodent, yeast, C. elegans and Drosophila. (Not recommended for prokaryotic samples.)

    If you have questions please email me at [email protected]

    Have a great day,

    Jennifer

    Leave a comment:


  • scbaker
    replied
    Originally posted by wacguy View Post
    Hi Shawn,

    I've seen your reply and wander wether there are new developments in the field such as constructing a directional library rRNA depleted with 1-5ng RNA that are not dependent on pol(A) enrichment but use random primers. I've looked thru and tried several kits and it seems like RNA quantity is still a problem.

    Thanks a lot,
    Guy
    I left Illumina a little over two years ago, so I can't answer specifically about their kits, but I've seen a number of solutions that use rRNA depletion (or avoidance). I haven't used any of these kits myself, but I'm sure they're impacted at least to some degree by RNA quality (not sure about 'quantity'). Also, I think they're a bit variable as to how many rRNA reads they let through. As long as you sequence deeply enough, you can probably afford to waste a few (million!) on rRNA.

    Good luck!

    Shawn

    Leave a comment:


  • ZWB
    replied
    This is a recently published, directional RNA library prep protocol that goes down to as low as 10ng of total RNA (or rRNA depleted RNA) using random priming. We have also tried 5ng of rRNA depleted RNA with good results.

    Leave a comment:


  • wacguy
    replied
    Originally posted by scbaker View Post
    In terms of input for the standard mRNA-Seq kit, the official recommendation does stand at 1ug. However, internally we've pushed that down considerably without any protocol modifications. Using high quality RNA, we routinely use 100ng of total RNA as the input amount and we've gotten libraries from as little as 5ng. However, going lower than ~20ng seems to give slightly lower correlations (r2 value) with 1ug samples.

    Shawn Baker
    Market Manager, Expression and Epigenetics
    Illumina
    Hi Shawn,

    I've seen your reply and wander wether there are new developments in the field such as constructing a directional library rRNA depleted with 1-5ng RNA that are not dependent on pol(A) enrichment but use random primers. I've looked thru and tried several kits and it seems like RNA quantity is still a problem.

    Thanks a lot,
    Guy

    Leave a comment:


  • das
    replied
    There is a paper in Genome Research on low starting amount protocol for RNAseq

    Leave a comment:


  • Nik
    replied
    Yes, also been down to 100ng with the SS mRNA seq protocol routinely with using as little as 80ng of OK Total RNA.

    Was listening to that webinar about DSN and had a chat to them about the 4 x hyb buffer recipe. It was not much help. Can anyone help? This stage have to be correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • krobison
    replied
    Illumina had a webinar this week on their DSN Total RNA-Seq protocol which can start with as little as 100ng total RNA.

    Leave a comment:


  • scbaker
    replied
    In terms of input for the standard mRNA-Seq kit, the official recommendation does stand at 1ug. However, internally we've pushed that down considerably without any protocol modifications. Using high quality RNA, we routinely use 100ng of total RNA as the input amount and we've gotten libraries from as little as 5ng. However, going lower than ~20ng seems to give slightly lower correlations (r2 value) with 1ug samples.

    Shawn Baker
    Market Manager, Expression and Epigenetics
    Illumina

    Leave a comment:


  • Nik
    replied
    Have a look at the directional mRNA protocol. Works for me but not cheap as you use two kits, sRNA and mRNA and other reagents you have to buy in. However it works using much lower concentration total RNA.

    Ask illumina when they are bring out the Universal RNA kit... Its about time.

    Leave a comment:


  • basager
    replied
    Thank you. I wrote to Illumina, and I'm excited waiting for them to reply. I have herad about the Nugen Ovation Kit, and I considered to use it. Since it is new I can't find anyone who has used it yet, and it really would be good to know that others have used it with good results before trying it out. Hopefully it will work without introducing too much bias. If you know anyone who has used it, please let me know.

    Leave a comment:


  • das
    replied
    Hi:
    Contact Illumina. I heard that they are working on a limited RNA protocol.
    I also think that two-step protocols that were developed for Affymetrix chips should be applicable for Illumina (In vitro transcription step to amplify RNA, then library construction.
    Then there is a Nugen Ovation kit

    Leave a comment:


  • basager
    started a topic RNA amount for RNA seq, Illumina

    RNA amount for RNA seq, Illumina

    Does anyone have experience with using a smaller amount of input RNA than what Illumina refers to in their RNA seq protocol? Illumina protocol claim to need 1-10 micrograms of total RNA. Unfortunately I have less starting material than this and I'm therefore wondering if anyone have used less than 1 microgram?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
72 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...