Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • discoveradnan
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 23

    #1

    Normalization of samples before pooling

    Hello everyone!

    Can you kindly tell me what is the best way to normalize the samples before pooling? The application I will be working on is screening different diseased genes for mutations.

    Thanks
    Last edited by discoveradnan; 12-03-2015, 08:31 PM. Reason: typo
  • williamhorne
    Junior Member
    • May 2014
    • 9

    #2
    I would follow the protocol pertaining to the kit you are using. FOr NextSeq 500 we do Qubit on the libraries and it works beautifully.

    William

    Comment

    • Ancestro
      Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 15

      #3
      I usually work with qubit quantifications after the PCR cleanup. Because we normalize based on Molarity, the Qubit conc is converted through this page: http://molbiol.edu.ru/eng/scripts/01_07.html.
      Normaly, the conversion factor is 1.5 but that differs on the average insertion length.

      Then, you must dilute your products to 4, 2 nM to pool them. I do not recomend you to dilute less than 2 nM, and preferably repeat the library prep (or concentrate) before you consider the sample to be pooled.
      Last edited by Ancestro; 03-31-2016, 07:49 AM. Reason: autocorrect fail.

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Lately we have been pooling without first normalizing the individual libraries. Equimolar amounts of each library are achieved by adjusting the volume added to the pool and then the whole pool is diluted down to ~10nM (or lower for low concentration libraries). The pool is then qPCR'd prior to loading. Using this method we seem to get better balance in our pools, but I'll admit I don't have hard data to back this up.

        Comment

        • luc
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 469

          #5
          If the concentrations do not vary wildly, I do not see any purpose in normalizing before pooling. We don't do it.

          Comment

          • LOH
            Registered Vendor
            • Jul 2010
            • 23

            #6
            We use tap station/bioanalyzer to get mean size of library, use Qubit to get conc. of library, then convert it to molar conc. for pooling.

            Comment

            • sajoshi
              Member
              • Dec 2015
              • 26

              #7
              I quantify each library with Qubit, in triplicates and take average. Then calculate how much you need for a 70 ng pool (for example). Change the pool concentration if needed to adjust final volume of pool to 15 or more. Then we do Qubit on the pool and dilute 1:2 and do Qubit again. Dilute only those which are >20 on Qubit. Use the 1:2 pool for qPCR. I think qPCR on the pool works better than doing qPCR on each library.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              32 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              40 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              45 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...