Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thomasblomquist
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 68

    #1

    Partial Order Alignment Step

    I'm running through Jared and Nick's Nature Methods de novo assembly approach on my Lambda burn-in FAST5 data. Just to get the pipeline up and running and some familiarity using a focused data set.

    I've successfully converted FAST5 to FASTA using poretools. Using the nanocorrect pipeline, I've performed the DALIGNER steps, and then now am processing using the Partial Order Alignment step using poaV2.

    It is working and the corrected.fasta file is growing... slowly. I've been tailing the file and the output when blasted is giving me 95% accuracy to NCBI refseq Lambda phage sequence. It's been chuggin along for a day. I have a 16 core 3.7 Ghz setup with 64 GB of ram, and plenty of SSD drive space to spare. It's only using a single thread (based on my system process utilization). And it's only sucked up 150 MB of working RAM.

    Wondering what others have done to parallelize this step, or what can be done for speed up?
  • ymc
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 496

    #2
    I used PBcR and then nanopolish with 2D reads only and I got good results. Is there a much better pipeline than PBcR+nanopolish?

    Comment

    • thomasblomquist
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 68

      #3
      Nanocorrect (daligner + poa), is the step preceding the celera assembly and nanopolish. This is to say, PBcR and nanopolish are next once the POA is done... When it gets done.

      Comment

      • ymc
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 496

        #4
        Thx. Let me give it a try

        Comment

        • ymc
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 496

          #5
          Ah. Nanocorrect outputs fasta but PBcR requires fastq input. How do u deal with that?

          Comment

          • thomasblomquist
            Member
            • Jul 2012
            • 68

            #6
            Interesting, I tried the combined PBcR MHAP pipeline with the oxford.spec and arrived at an assembly in 20 minutes with 98% match to the NCBI ref seq for Lambda.

            The DALIGNER, POA and RunCA with the oxford.spec arrived at the assembly after 1.5 days with >99% match to the NCBI ref seq for Lambda.

            The major difference seems to be the latter is more accurate in the homopolymer runs.

            Still for rapid identification and other purposes, the PBcR MHAP pipeline is more than adequate.

            -Tom

            Comment

            • ymc
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 496

              #7
              How did you obtain the frg file need for runCA? I suppose you only had one fasta file from the nanocorrect pipeline without any qual file, right?

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              42 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...