Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thomasblomquist
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 68

    Partial Order Alignment Step

    I'm running through Jared and Nick's Nature Methods de novo assembly approach on my Lambda burn-in FAST5 data. Just to get the pipeline up and running and some familiarity using a focused data set.

    I've successfully converted FAST5 to FASTA using poretools. Using the nanocorrect pipeline, I've performed the DALIGNER steps, and then now am processing using the Partial Order Alignment step using poaV2.

    It is working and the corrected.fasta file is growing... slowly. I've been tailing the file and the output when blasted is giving me 95% accuracy to NCBI refseq Lambda phage sequence. It's been chuggin along for a day. I have a 16 core 3.7 Ghz setup with 64 GB of ram, and plenty of SSD drive space to spare. It's only using a single thread (based on my system process utilization). And it's only sucked up 150 MB of working RAM.

    Wondering what others have done to parallelize this step, or what can be done for speed up?
  • ymc
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 496

    #2
    I used PBcR and then nanopolish with 2D reads only and I got good results. Is there a much better pipeline than PBcR+nanopolish?

    Comment

    • thomasblomquist
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 68

      #3
      Nanocorrect (daligner + poa), is the step preceding the celera assembly and nanopolish. This is to say, PBcR and nanopolish are next once the POA is done... When it gets done.

      Comment

      • ymc
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 496

        #4
        Thx. Let me give it a try

        Comment

        • ymc
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2010
          • 496

          #5
          Ah. Nanocorrect outputs fasta but PBcR requires fastq input. How do u deal with that?

          Comment

          • thomasblomquist
            Member
            • Jul 2012
            • 68

            #6
            Interesting, I tried the combined PBcR MHAP pipeline with the oxford.spec and arrived at an assembly in 20 minutes with 98% match to the NCBI ref seq for Lambda.

            The DALIGNER, POA and RunCA with the oxford.spec arrived at the assembly after 1.5 days with >99% match to the NCBI ref seq for Lambda.

            The major difference seems to be the latter is more accurate in the homopolymer runs.

            Still for rapid identification and other purposes, the PBcR MHAP pipeline is more than adequate.

            -Tom

            Comment

            • ymc
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 496

              #7
              How did you obtain the frg file need for runCA? I suppose you only had one fasta file from the nanocorrect pipeline without any qual file, right?

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              28 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...