Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • carmeyeii
    replied
    Hi!

    I'm analyzing a "second-hand" dataset generated using SOLiD 4. It is a transcriptome mate pair library that is 52 x 37 nt, and I cannot for the sake of me find the protocol that was used to generate those specific read lengths. I have F3 and R3 reads, so I am assuming it is a circularization protocol, but I do not know what the size selection parameters were, or how the circles were cut to produce the final fragments. This info would be very valuable for a more accurate mapping.

    Any knowledge would be greatly appreciated!

    Thanks a lot,

    Carmen

    Leave a comment:


  • Zaag
    replied
    From the manual (buildup of the manual is as horrible as the GUI):

    1. Create a text file with one command per line. For example:
    cd proj1
    cd run2
    set workflow analysis.pln
    add xsq xsqfile
    set reference hg19
    run
    ls
    exit

    2. Save the file, for example as proj1script.

    3. Then run with this command:
    lscope.sh -u user -w password < proj1script

    Note: This example does not include the commands necessary to step up a new analysis.


    See page 78 of the Command shell user guide, there are several other/easier ways if you have standard pipelines.

    Leave a comment:


  • matan8
    replied
    How do you use the command line to map the data? I am looking for examples for that, but can't find any.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    If you say so, I might give it a second chance.

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • golharam
    replied
    I agree. I only use LifeScope to map data, and I use the command-line interface. The GUI is horrible. Once I have the BAM files I do the rest of my processing outside of LifeScope.

    I ask because I keep hearing LifeScope does a better job mapping reads than other tools. I haven't tried others myself though.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    Did you try it?
    Its interface is very uncomfortable and it cannot be fully operated through shell scripts.

    Leave a comment:


  • golharam
    replied
    Just out of curiosity, why are you not using LifeScope?

    Leave a comment:


  • yksikaksi
    replied
    Originally posted by AmitL View Post
    Yes.
    Shrimp2 collapses because of non-existing input problems. I have checked the input manually and it was ok. It works with all other tools.

    I preferred not to deal with such a buggy tool.

    But thanks!
    Hum... it is strange. I managed to map my csfasta reads with SHRiMP2 but not BWA.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    Yes.
    Shrimp2 collapses because of non-existing input problems. I have checked the input manually and it was ok. It works with all other tools.

    I preferred not to deal with such a buggy tool.

    But thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • yksikaksi
    replied
    Have you consider to map your csfasta reads with SHRiMP2?

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    Alright. Thanks a lot!

    Leave a comment:


  • nilshomer
    replied
    Originally posted by AmitL View Post
    How do you know it's meant for mate-pairs?

    On the documentation it says:
    Check out the source code "bwape.c" and search for SOLID. It uses the F3/R3 "pairing", which is mate pair.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    How do you know it's meant for mate-pairs?

    On the documentation it says:
    Generate alignments in the SAM format given paired-end reads.

    Leave a comment:


  • nilshomer
    replied
    The new version does not work with color space. The older version works with mate pairs and color space, but not paired end and color space.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmitL
    replied
    I know the new version does not work with color-space.
    Are you saying that it's true for the older versions too?

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
    by seqadmin



    Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.

    Somatic Genomics
    “We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...
    05-24-2024, 01:16 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 06-03-2024, 06:55 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-30-2024, 03:16 PM
0 responses
26 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-29-2024, 01:32 PM
0 responses
29 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-24-2024, 07:15 AM
0 responses
216 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X