Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Geneious
    Registered Vendor
    • Jul 2010
    • 22

    #1

    Building a Circular de novo Assembler

    Geneious developer Matt Kearse has written a blog about how he built the circular de novo assembler for the R7 Update. Hopefully some of you will find this an interesting read.



    There are two approaches I could have taken to add circular contig support. The simple approach is at the end of the assembly process to circularize any contigs whose ends look sufficiently similar. The second more complex approach is to allow contigs to circularize during the assembly process and still allow similar sequences and contigs to merge into the circular contigs later. This approach is more robust and more likely to produce correct results. For example if we have two related species present in a data set, the ends of the temporary linear contigs may be sufficiently similar to merge into a large incorrect linear contig. But if we circularize during the assembly process, instead of merging they'll correctly circularize first.
  • TiborNagy
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 329

    #2
    Looks interesting. But how can handle this algorithm more than one circular contigs? (For example a bacterial genome and it's plasmids.)

    Comment

    • Matt Kearse
      Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 20

      #3
      The algorithm may produce multiple circular contigs as each contig may independently circularize.

      As a quick confirmation I downloaded a random sample of 100 viral genomes, 24 of which are circular. I generated simulated data from them all and mixed it all together.

      De novo assembly of this mixed data produced 106 contigs, 6 of them being tiny contigs consisting of reads with errors. The other 100 contigs produced matched the original genomes perfectly apart from a 2 bp uncertainty due to read errors in 1 genome. 77 contigs were linear and 23 were circular in keeping with the original genomes. 1 failed to circularize due to insufficient coverage.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...