Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ulz_peter
    replied
    oops, I think I should go to bed...

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
    just a kind of checklist:
    Introduction
    May you elaborate a bit?

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
    I guess going into more detail will lead to other details neede to be mentioned, so for the overall picture the letter is great as it is now. Some hundred words for the future directions part and that's it I'd say.

    Just one question:

    Isn't there a noun missing (like community or forum)? My English is too bad to judge if thats comprehensible...
    I think SEQanswers is a term that speaks itself. We may add community and make it the "SEQanswers community" ?

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    so we mention:
    the community
    question and answer of bioinformatic tools
    wet-lab parts
    SEQanswers as knowledge base
    papers already published mentioning SEQanswers

    we've got the introduction and the future perspectives part is going to come...

    So, I guess that's pretty much it
    Last edited by ulz_peter; 10-07-2011, 11:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    I guess going into more detail will lead to other details neede to be mentioned, so for the overall picture the letter is great as it is now. Some hundred words for the future directions part and that's it I'd say.

    Just one question:
    We founded the SEQanswers (http://SEQanswers.com) to facilitate rapid dissemination of HTS
    Isn't there a noun missing (like community or forum)? My English is too bad to judge if thats comprehensible...

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Just for information for all, some writings under the section "Content" are extracted directly from the SEQwiki MS, so that serves merely a background, shouldn't be copied and pasted into the letter.

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
    good idea. Sorry for interfering.

    He's probably the best man to address that question to...
    You are helping a lot, Peter. But for the Future directions, well, he has the say......

    Let's think something else we may have missed now.....anything else?

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    good idea. Sorry for interfering.

    He's probably the best man to address that question to...

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
    you're right active voice is probably better. I added the future directions part of the untrimmed letter, but it somehow interfers with the former paragraph...
    Peter, sorry I deleted the Future Directions for now. I have emailed ECO for his advices on Future Directions.

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    you're right active voice is probably better. I added the future directions part of the untrimmed letter, but it somehow interfers with the former paragraph...

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    Peter, my fault. I also count the words after I posted "ready to go".....

    Good to write some more things. And for a "letter", I think we need active voice rather than passive voice.

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    As the current version only has 170 something words (without references of course), do we want to add some future directions parts?

    Leave a comment:


  • ulz_peter
    replied
    Great stuff, totally agree with the current version. References look great indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    polished the language, the letter is ready to go! (IMO)

    Leave a comment:


  • marcowanger
    replied
    I have added all high impact journals that acknowledge SEQ* explicitly in their text to our letter to science. It looks nice!

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Today, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
68 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...