Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zgene
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 8

    #1

    Incidental findings according to ACMG recommendation

    Dear All,

    I have a question about how to report incidental findings in exome samples for the clinical diagnostic purposes.
    I have read the ACMG recommendations for reporting incidental findings in patients and tried to filter out the pathogenic variants in the 56 genes suggested to be checked by ACMG.
    When I filter out the variants using common polymorphisms in dbSNP142, the remaining pathogenic variants are mostly not so much. However, without this filtration there would be around 20 remaining variants on average that should be checked manually to investigate their probable pathogenicity.
    Most of these variants are the common polymorphisms (reported through GWAS studies) which are associated with more common disorders and not the rare variants of monogenic disorders.
    Since there is no accurate recommendation about the type of variants that should be reported to patients, I was wondering whether we should check these associated polymorphisms manually and investigate their effects in these disorders and then report them to patients, or we should just report the rare pathogenic variants (DM variants in HGMD) as incidental findings?

    I am looking forward to hearing from you.
  • uhodoglugil
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2016
    • 1

    #2
    ACMG guidelines recommends to report "Mendelian type" variants not "GWAS type" variants. Pls read the guideline again

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    33 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...