@wallysbo1. thanks for suggestion.
My data are sequenced through hiseq2000 (whole genome shortgun approach) illumina paired-end reads interleaved using velvet shuffleseq.pl script after filtration through trimmomatic. Checked with fastqc, it passed all the test with warning in 'per sequence content' and 'sequence duplication level'.
I have tried with lower kmer with 17, included histor_17.txt I have tried with 15, 17, 21, 25,27,30 I see peak at 5. Any suggestion?. Is the reads are filtered properly? how to estimate genome size?.
histor_17.txt- pl.see attachment at link below
http://www.fileswap.com/dl/rSoQKp5sLi/
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
You should probably drop k lower, but its hard to tell only seeing coverage out to 10. If that’s your “real” peak at coverage=5, k is much too big for your sequencing depth. Of course, I’ve seen double dips in the peaks before for different reasons (meaning you might have a second local maximum at a higher coverage), such as heterozygousity or contaminates, but dropping k should be the first step.
Leave a comment:
-
Jellyfish-kmer, genome size estimation
Dear all,
I am running jelly fish (jellyfish-2.1.1) for first time to estimate genome size. Although I followed manual, i am bit confused to estimate genome size. Below are my steps for kmer 27. Did I get correct genome size estimation. If I want to try different kmers to get best kmer & genome size how I do plotting? If any body have script to plot for different kmers and find best kmer and genome size, please share with me.
Quote:
jellyfish count -m 27 -s 100M -t 10 -C sample.filtered.fastq
jellyfish histo -f mer_counts.jf > histogram.txt
jellyfish stats -v -o stats.txt mer_counts.jf
less stats.txt
Unique: 659211049
Distinct: 2297173537
Total: 31359408599
Max_count: 16054234
(END)
less histogram.txt (first 10 rows)
0 0
1 659211049
2 94535838
3 109738065
4 125218564
5 126564348
6 117188987
7 103591231
8 90823407
9 80950377
10 74112334
Genome size estimation= totalnumber of distant kmers - distinct error kmers
Genome size estimation=31359408599 - 2297173537 = 31130235062
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moinul View PostThanks seb, but I want to know how to find the exact K-mer of my genome. Should it be the inflection point you said or the pick of the histogram?
Then why "This will be your estimated genome k-mers multiplied by 2. Divide this number by 2 and there you go" . I am a little bit confused here.
Why I can't divide the sum of all coverage contribution to this K-mer (if it would really be the inflection point)?
Thanks again
Moinul
However, if the peak is 55, then we can say that on average, a unique region of the genome has a k-mer coverage of 55. But any unique region can also have a k-mer coverage of 54.
In the k-mer coverage depth distribution, erroneous k-mers and genome k-mers are present. If you take the sum of the number of k-mers at each coverage depth, you will obtain a number that includes erroneous k-mers.
Using the minimum before the inflection point or the gamma distribution are ways to eliminate the erroneous k-mers although both methods are not perfect.
You DNA reads origin from either the forward or the reverse strand in the genome. Since be can't know for sure which, k-mer counters consider both strands.
So, the count will include both strands. Therefore you must divide by 2.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks seb, but I want to know how to find the exact K-mer of my genome. Should it be the inflection point you said or the pick of the histogram?
Then why "This will be your estimated genome k-mers multiplied by 2. Divide this number by 2 and there you go" . I am a little bit confused here.
Why I can't divide the sum of all coverage contribution to this K-mer (if it would really be the inflection point)?
Thanks again
Moinul
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lletourn View PostFor sure, but it won't be 3,4,5 times bigger. It's a pretty close approximation.
another way of computing genome size without an assembly is to count kmer coverage. An example of this can be found here:
The problem with this approach is if you have plasmids, chloroplast, (high coverage small genomes). These will skew the graph.
Then, find the minimum left of this inflection point and discard all k-mers on the left of this minimum.
This usually works well.
Finally, you sum all the counts with a coverage value greater or equal to the minimum.
This will be your estimated genome k-mers multiplied by 2. Divide this number by 2 and there you go.
Example: http://postimage.org/image/1p5t8wmsk/
As highlighted in your link, you want to discard the erroneous k-mers by fitting a distribution with a known equation.
The Ray assembler generates such a coverage distribution.
see http://denovoassembler.sf.net
-seb
Leave a comment:
-
For sure, but it won't be 3,4,5 times bigger. It's a pretty close approximation.
another way of computing genome size without an assembly is to count kmer coverage. An example of this can be found here:
The problem with this approach is if you have plasmids, chloroplast, (high coverage small genomes). These will skew the graph.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lletourn View PostThe sum of the size of your contigs/scaffolds from the assembly should be your genome size.
It can also come with 'extras' such as contaminants (stuff in the assembly, not in the target genome), possibly "over-expansion" of heterozygous regions into separate contigs.
Leave a comment:
-
The sum of the size of your contigs/scaffolds from the assembly should be your genome size.
Leave a comment:
-
Genome size estimation
Hi,
I have the de novo assembly was done by clc and also have the reference assembly ie.mapping all the read files to de novo assembly. Now, I want to estimate the genome size from these information.
Can anybody help me how could I do that?Tags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.
Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
This week,...-
Channel: Articles
10-07-2024, 08:07 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...-
Channel: Articles
09-23-2024, 06:35 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:55 AM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 06:55 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
|
0 responses
109 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
|
0 responses
114 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
|
1 response
118 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by EmiTom
10-07-2024, 06:46 AM
|
Leave a comment: