Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ChIPseq on tissue - eliminating background

    Hi,

    I am trying to do ChIPseq on tissue for a transcription factor that is expressed in a single cell type within a tissue. Therefore, specific signal is only going to be derived from about 3% of the input chromatin.
    By ChIP-qPCR, I have managed to consistently get 15 to 100x enrichment (calculated in both ways, foldchange of specific IP vs IgG IP, and %input candidate region/%input negative control region) for six different candidate genes, while negative control regions were not enriched.
    So I went forward to ChIP-seq which turned out somewhat disappointing as there is a lot of non-specific signal in the IP sample that looks similar to an input signal. However, I do get peaks that reflect the enrichment at my candidate genes but these peaks don't look great. I don't know yet how to summarize peak statistics in an appropriate fashion, but when you plot the read count there is like one or two reads in almost any 100bp window, and the count just goes up to like 6-7 reads within a peak. My feeling is that I would be able to get much better peaks if I was not having all those unspecific fragments lingering around and interfering with library amplification.
    Has anybody come across a similar problem and would be able to give some suggestions?

    Thanks

    Theorbe

    Here is what I did for this sample:
    Dissect tissue, xlink.
    Lyse and sonicate to ~300bp on average (>75% of signal smaller than 500bp).
    IP (antibody is good and has been giving us excellent results in any application it has been used for including ChIPchip and ChIP-qpCR). Capture Ab with magnetic beads (blocked with BSA and tRNA). Multiple washes, including several high-salt washes with both NaCl and LiCl containing buffers. Elute DNA and clean up with PCI x3.
    Pooled six of such ChIP-DNAs and checked for enrichment of best candidate gene by PCR(100fold). Library prep done on a SPRIworks system followed by Illumina sequencing.

  • #2
    what are your aligner parameters? did you eliminate multiple match or duplicate reads berfore analysis?
    did you do qPCR on your sequencing library?

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi mudshark,

      I am not entirely sure about all aligner parameters since I have only received aligned reads from our seq facility. I would have to ask them for more details if this turns out to be the crucial point. This is as much as I know: they use the first 25nt of a read as a seed and allow 2 mismatches. If multiple matches for a seed are reported, quality scores for the entire read are taken into account and the read will be called as 'multiple' or 'unique' based on parameters that I am not aware of.
      Multiple matches and duplicates were excluded in the analysis.
      I have not yet done qPCR on the library.

      Theorbe

      Comment


      • #4
        what is your model organism and how many mapped reads do you get? what's the mappability fraction of your reads?

        i would also try to keep the duplicates as in my opinion the duplicate removal can potentially generate a HUGE problem if your IP works very well, there are very few target sites and you have tons of mapped reads. then you will elminate all your signals due to true, i.e. non-artificial, read duplication.

        and do the qPCR on your library!
        Last edited by mudshark; 06-24-2011, 03:26 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Definitely do qPCR on your libraries to make sure you still have good enrichment following library construction. I have made libraries from ChiP samples that were good (high fold enrichment of several targets) that no longer showed good enrichment so I didn't proceed with sequencing.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            The Impact of AI in Genomic Medicine
            by seqadmin



            Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved from a futuristic vision to a mainstream technology, highlighted by the introduction of tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini. In recent years, AI has become increasingly integrated into the field of genomics. This integration has enabled new scientific discoveries while simultaneously raising important ethical questions1. Interviews with two researchers at the center of this intersection provide insightful perspectives into...
            02-26-2024, 02:07 PM
          • seqadmin
            Multiomics Techniques Advancing Disease Research
            by seqadmin


            New and advanced multiomics tools and technologies have opened new avenues of research and markedly enhanced various disciplines such as disease research and precision medicine1. The practice of merging diverse data from various ‘omes increasingly provides a more holistic understanding of biological systems. As Maddison Masaeli, Co-Founder and CEO at Deepcell, aptly noted, “You can't explain biology in its complex form with one modality.”

            A major leap in the field has
            ...
            02-08-2024, 06:33 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, Today, 06:12 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-23-2024, 04:11 PM
          0 responses
          64 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2024, 08:52 AM
          0 responses
          70 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-20-2024, 08:57 AM
          0 responses
          60 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X