Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osl
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    #1

    Good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq?

    Hi all,
    Just wondering if anyone could recommend a good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq.
    I've tried quite a few (including ab290, JL-8) for ChIP-qPCR. I just found the polyclonal gives rather high background, and the monoclonal seems to have low efficiency (I'm working on Arabidopsis).
    Also, for ChIP-Seq, is monoclonal Ab a better choice over polyclonal?
    Thanks ahead.
    os
  • mudshark
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 138

    #2
    this systems works really well:


    as for 'normal' ABs, unpurified polyclonal sera usually work best in my hands, monoclonals are usually less preferred.

    Comment

    • osl
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Thank you mudshark. I'll try this system.
      Have you been working with the GFP-Trap agarose or the magnetic ones? Looks like the agarose beads have a higher binding capacity.
      Thanks again.

      Comment

      • mudshark
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 138

        #4
        agarose only, no idea about the magnetic ones.

        Comment

        • Buchi
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 1

          #5
          ChIP-Seq with GFP-Trap agarose beads

          Originally posted by mudshark View Post
          this systems works really well:


          as for 'normal' ABs, unpurified polyclonal sera usually work best in my hands, monoclonals are usually less preferred.

          Hi,

          I would also try the GFP-Trap for my experiments. Do you have a good working protocol?

          Cheers

          Comment

          • epigeneticfan
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2012
            • 4

            #6
            Originally posted by osl View Post
            Hi all,
            Just wondering if anyone could recommend a good anti-GFP/YFP for ChIP-Seq.
            I've tried quite a few (including ab290, JL-8) for ChIP-qPCR. I just found the polyclonal gives rather high background, and the monoclonal seems to have low efficiency (I'm working on Arabidopsis).
            Also, for ChIP-Seq, is monoclonal Ab a better choice over polyclonal?
            Thanks ahead.
            os

            There is no general rule for using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, but the main differences are the following:

            The big advantage of the polyclonal is that it will recognize several epitopes on the same antigen. Which increase the change to recover enough material, especially for sequencing. But you have batch-to-batch variation. It might be that a monoclonal is “too specific”, it recognized only one epitope. And in some cases this epitope might be hidden (because of the fixation with formaldehyde leading to a different chromatin structure. All polyclonal antibodies are different so you will have to try by yourself.

            The advantage of the monoclonal is that once you have a good one and it works you don’t have to worry about batch-to-batch variations.

            Coming to the antibody: what we have in our catalogue is the following antibody:

            Validated in IF, but not yet in ChIP.
            Attached Files

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2




              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
              Today, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            68 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            48 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...