Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hedgehog
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2015
    • 2

    Problematic ChIP and ChIP-seq_non-specific binding_help....

    Hi there,

    I have been having so much problems with ChIP. Hope someone out there could give me some advice because I ran out of things to try/replace.

    Once upon a time, I could do ChIP and ChIP-seq (lol) but recently, when I use the qubit to quantitate my ChIP samples, I have been getting abnormally high DNA amount in my immunoprecipitated samples but not in my either no-antibody control or IgG control. We are talking about 0.5ug/500 K cells for a histone modification...insane and I don't believe it. I used to struggle to get 4-5ng in total using a couple of million cells. However, ChIP-qPCR using control regions and etc showed results consistent to when ChIP used to work (can't remember what that feels like anymore). This is odd.

    When I used these samples to generate ChIP-seq libraries, the sequencing results were really bad. Alignment rate was poor when using global alignment (<50%) but it was good when I used local alignment (>96%). Local alignment analysis showed that it always the ends of my reads don't always align. Not sure if I am making sense. So I am just thinking some small bits of DNA are somehow getting ligated to my actual ChIP-DNA?? These non-specific DNA could give me abnormally high DNA measurement when I quantitate my samples using the Qubit? Is this even possible?

    I thought my buffers were contaminated or something so I replaced all the chip buffers. This did not fix the problem. I still get abnormally high DNA amount.

    Has anyone come across this before problem before?

    Thanks heaps!

    H.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...