Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • majo82
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 3

    RRBS library prep.

    Hi all!
    I tried to prepaare a library for genome wide methylation analysis with RRBS.
    Unfortunatly I saw that MspI is a very very annoing enzyme which digest very slowly and unefficiently. The Meissner paper which reported this tecnique said that they use 5-20 U of enzyme for 30 ng-1 micrograms (nat methods 2010) or 10-100 U of enzyme for 1-10 micrograms (nature 2008) of genomic DNA. Here in institute, to obtain a "smear" of digested DNA (visible only upper 700 bp) we use 100-300 U for 1 microgram of DNA and digested overnight. We tried a lot of things ad the best seems this, far from conditions disclaimend in the paper..Is there someone who can suggest me somenthing new?
    I load into gel 1 micrograms of digested dna and purified the "gel zone" (when i never had seen any smear) 100-400 bp and I obtained only 1 ng of DNA!!!!!
    And if I would digest twice the dna (that is digest and re-digest?)
    please help me
  • volks
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 80

    #2
    keep in mind that you are enriching for ~1% of the original genome. so starting from 1ug you would get out 10ng at the max if you dont overdigest.

    edit: this estimation is for human, fragments ranging 40 to 240bp.
    Last edited by volks; 03-23-2011, 10:00 AM.

    Comment

    • majo82
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Thank you volks!
      I think that anyway is better to load my digested DNA after the adpter ligation for library preparation...And use polyacrilamide gradient gel for checking the digestion.
      I write to Meissner (who developed the technique) and Bock and they gave me the newest protocol paper from Meissner lab (with pictures of the gels)


      I think this should improve the yield...
      Thank you anyway
      ale

      Comment

      • C.R.
        Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 25

        #4
        I think the trick is to use an appropriate gel for checking. On a high percentage gel the DNA looks uncut, but on lower percentage gel my samples look similar to the the example from the Zymo web page: http://www.zymoresearch.com/zrc/img/product/D5014.jpg

        Comment

        • majo82
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 3

          #5
          What type of gel do you prepare?I obtain a modest "smear" with agarose 1.%...
          thanks
          ale

          Comment

          • C.R.
            Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 25

            #6
            I digest 1µg DNA and use a standard 0.7% agarose gel. I see a smear starting from uncut = approx. 10,000 to 100-200. The intensity below 200 bps gets lower. With 1% it should already look much better than with 2%.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            111 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...