Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hrseq
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 5

    #1

    finding deletions of length 20 - 50bp from 100bp reads

    Hi

    What would be the suggested approach to find deletions in the range of 20 - 50 bp in human data? The reads are 100bp illumina reads.

    Any suggestions?

    regards
    hubet
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    We have used a split-read strategy (described here) to find indels in this size range. Essentially, single reads are treated as pseudo-paired end reads, which provides single-base resolution for the size of the intervening sequence.

    Comment

    • shi
      Wei Shi
      • Feb 2010
      • 236

      #3
      Originally posted by hrseq View Post
      Hi

      What would be the suggested approach to find deletions in the range of 20 - 50 bp in human data? The reads are 100bp illumina reads.

      Any suggestions?

      regards
      hubet
      You may try Subread (set '-I' to be 50). When the specified indel length is greater than 16, it performs local assembly to find long indels.

      Comment

      • gringer
        David Eccles (gringer)
        • May 2011
        • 845

        #4
        You may also be able to shoehorn Tophat into doing this as well, because it also maps read subsequences.

        Comment

        • alexdobin
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 161

          #5
          Any RNA-seq aligner that can detect novel non-canonical splices can be used to detect deletions. I would recommend STAR, of course . The problem with using TopHat for this puprose is that it only detects "canonical" and "semi-canonical" intron motifs (GT/AG, GC/AG, AT/AC).

          Comment

          • jp.
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 142

            #6
            Hi
            I got something very basic and important before alignment. I hope that someone would please let me know this.

            I have got raw sequence data (seq1.fastq seq2.fastq) from paired end Illumina2000 company and I used these Paired-End files directly to align with hg19 using BWA and Tophat(bowtie). I checked using grep and found that there enough N. I am wondering if this will impact on my allinment and subsequently on mutation/tophat calls.... OR a trimming is required before aligning these to remove N and then use in BWA ? Can BWA alone handle N and remove them, however, these will not aligned with hg19 so will automatically be removed... ??
            Expecting kind reply
            Thank you in advance
            jp.


            Originally posted by alexdobin View Post
            Any RNA-seq aligner that can detect novel non-canonical splices can be used to detect deletions. I would recommend STAR, of course . The problem with using TopHat for this puprose is that it only detects "canonical" and "semi-canonical" intron motifs (GT/AG, GC/AG, AT/AC).

            Comment

            • gringer
              David Eccles (gringer)
              • May 2011
              • 845

              #7
              Can BWA alone handle N and remove them, however, these will not aligned with hg19 so will automatically be removed... ?
              This is unrelated to this thread topic, and also unrelated to the post that you quoted. Please post your question in a new thread.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                by SEQadmin2




                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                Today, 06:46 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
              0 responses
              15 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              68 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              48 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...