Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bylemcsmith
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 2

    #1

    SNP Filtering

    I have a list of SNPs and I was wondering if I could get a response as to the best way to filter these SNPs. I would normally do it be Quality but I'm confused as to why some of the SNPs say VarscanHighConfidence but don't have a quality score.

    #CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT TCGA-17-Z012-01A-01W-0746-08 TCGA-17-Z012-01A-01W-0746-08-Samtools TCGA-17-Z012-11A-01W-0746-08 TCGA-17-Z012-11A-01W-0746-08-Sniper TCGA-17-Z012-01A-01W-0746-08-Sniper TCGA-17-Z012-11A-01W-0746-08-VarscanSomatic TCGA-17-Z012-01A-01W-0746-08-VarscanSomatic TCGA-17-Z012-11A-01W-0746-08-Strelka TCGA-17-Z012-01A-01W-0746-08-Strelka
    1 14907 . A G 8 . . GT:GQP:BQ:MQ:AD:FA:VAQ:SS:FT 0/1:8:7:34,35:22:4,3:0.429:8:.:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter 0/1:8:7:34,35:22:4,3:0.429:8:.:SnpFilter .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
    1 14930 . A G . . . GTPP4:BQ:FA:VAQ:SS:FT:IGT:BCOUNT:GQ:JGQ:MQ:AMQ:SSC:AD 0/1:8:2,2,3,1:33,31:0.5:38:2:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter:0/1:4,0,4,0:38:.:24:23,24:34:4,4 0/1:8:.,.,.,.:33,31:0.5:38:.:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter:.:.,.,.,.:38:.:24:.:.:4,4 0/0:4:4,0,0,0:34:0:0:0:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:0/0:4,0,0,0:39:.:23:23:.:. 0/0:4:4,0,0,0:34:.:0:0:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:0/0:4,0,0,0:39:.:23:23:.:. 0/1:8:2,2,3,1:34,31:.:38:2:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:0/1:4,0,4,0:35:.:24:23,24:34:. 0/0:4:.,.,.,.:.:0:.:.:VarscanHighConfidence:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:. 0/1:8:2,2,3,1:.:0.5:8:2:VarscanHighConfidence:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.
    1 16257 . G C . . . GT:IGTPP4:BCOUNT:GQ:JGQ:VAQ:BQ:MQ:AMQ:SS:SSC:FT:AD:FA 0/1:0/1:5:1,1,1,1:0,2,2,0:18:.:18:34,31:25:30,23:2:18:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter:3,2:0.4 0/1:.:5:.,.,.,.:.,.,.,.:18:.:18:34,31:25:.:.:.:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter:3,2:0.4 0/0:0/0:1:1,0,0,0:0,0,1,0:15:.:0:36:15:15:0:.:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:.:. 0/0:0/0:1:1,0,0,0:0,0,1,0:15:.:0:36:15:15:0:.:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:.:. 0/1:0/1:4:1,1,1,1:0,2,2,0:8:.:21:31,34:27:30,23:2:18:FalsePositive-IntersectionFailure:.:. .:.:.:.,.,.,.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.,.,.,.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.,.,.,.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.,.,.,.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
    1 30923 . G T 6 . . GT:GQP:BQ:MQ:AD:FA:VAQ:SS:FT 0/1:0:1:0,36:37:0,1:1:6:.:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter 0/1:0:1:0,36:37:0,1:1:6:.:SnpFilter .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
    1 52238 . T G 31 . . GT:GQP:BQ:MQ:AD:FA:VAQ:SS:FT 1/1:3:2:0,31:33:0,2:1:31:.:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter 1/1:3:2:0,31:33:0,2:1:31:.:SnpFilter .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
    1 55085 . T A . . . GTPP4:BQ:FA:VAQ:SS:FT:GQ:MQ:AD 1/1:4:0,0,2,1:0,33:1:42:1:IntersectionFailure-SnpFilter:9:20:0,4 1/1:4:.,.,.,.:0,33:1:42:.:SnpFilter:9:20:0,4 1/1:5:.,.,.,.:.:1:.:.:VarscanHighConfidence:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 1/1:5:.,.,.,.:.:1:.:.:VarscanHighConfidence:.:.:. 1/1:3:0,0,2,1:.:1:0:1:VarscanHighConfidence:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.,.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
  • chrisamiller
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 7

    #2
    VarscanHighConfidence is in the FT field. That's the name of the filter that removed that site (it failed the filter that retains high-confidence SNPs).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...