Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2007lab
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 14

    Multiple sample comparion or Segregation analysis

    Hi,
    Wondering if there has been any reports of multiple samples comparison done for variants?
    Say in the TCGA or 100 exomes projects from different centres, has anyone developed scripts to compare multiple samples, weighted on their coverage and confidence scores?
    This would be also useful for segregation analyses in Mendelian disorders... to follow up linkage.
  • schelhorn
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 10

    #2
    I would be also interested in comparing SNPs and short Indels from multiple samples (patients with different genotypes) .The GATK and Samtools SNP-discovery modules do not seem to include a comparison of multiple samples. Perhaps they shouldn't, and this should better be done externally. Does anyone know of an R package or some in-house scripts that can simplify the job? Should be a pretty common task in variant discovery. I basically would like to throw the pileups of two patient-groups at a tool and get back the SNPs/indels that vary significantly between the groups (given a suitable statistical model).

    Comment

    • ntremblay
      Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 31

      #3
      Hi,

      you can use any scripts or tools that intersect parameter such as rsID or chromosomal positions to compare a set of snp called from different sample...

      Excel can do the job for exome sequencing as you should call about 20000 snps from a sample ...

      Otherwise, a script like compare from VarScan will return the intersect, difference, etc. from a file, but it takes only 2 files at a time,

      If you want to do segregation analysis, start with the last generation and move up the pedegree with your interesting snp ...

      Might also want to run all your snp trough polyphen or SIFT to do this analysis on snps that are predicted to be damaging,

      Hope that helps,
      Nicolas Tremblay
      Graduate Student

      Cardiovascular Genetics - Andelfinger Lab
      CHU Ste-Justine Research Center

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...