Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biocc
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 36

    SNP or not

    I used MAQ, VAAL and novoalign to map solexa reads on a reference genome . ouput of these softwares showed a delete or a SNP exist. but when I used Tablet for visualization and exploration of sequence assemblies, it seems information from alignment is not sufficient for the mutaion. why? which is right.
    thanks.
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    IMHO, the only way to validate a SNP is by PCR and first gen sequencing. Obviously you can only do this for a small minority of SNPs.

    Comment

    • Lee Sam
      Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 57

      #3
      If you just want to visualize it, you might want to try the UCSC genome browser which allows you to plug in BAM files output from the aligners. I'm not sure how to do it exactly, as someone else set up the infrastructure I'm using.

      Comment

      • ntremblay
        Member
        • Dec 2009
        • 31

        #4
        Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
        IMHO, the only way to validate a SNP is by PCR and first gen sequencing. Obviously you can only do this for a small minority of SNPs.
        You could use a lot of techniques to validate a snp! The traditional way of doing it is PCR + Sanger seq, but new techniques like Taq Man assay, Sequenom Assay, Allelic discrimination with a melting curve in QPCR, etc.!
        Nicolas Tremblay
        Graduate Student

        Cardiovascular Genetics - Andelfinger Lab
        CHU Ste-Justine Research Center

        Comment

        • drio
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2008
          • 323

          #5
          What did you use to call the SNPs? Most tools are not very stringent in the default mode and require tweaking the parameters and/or perform downstream filters to improve the specificity.
          -drd

          Comment

          • biocc
            Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 36

            #6
            thanks for your reply

            Originally posted by drio View Post
            What did you use to call the SNPs? Most tools are not very stringent in the default mode and require tweaking the parameters and/or perform downstream filters to improve the specificity.
            I want to find the genome difference between two bacterial strains and analysis the phenotype of them. I use samtools for downstream filter, is there other methods better? thanks

            Comment

            • severin
              Genome Informatics Facility
              • Sep 2009
              • 105

              #7
              Illumina Goldengate

              You could also use Illumina Goldengate technology to verify potential SNPs.
              Instead of performing a screen on a small number of SNPs on many genomes, you can perform it on many SNPs for 1 or 2 genomes.

              Comment

              • drio
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 323

                #8
                Originally posted by biocc View Post
                I want to find the genome difference between two bacterial strains and analysis the phenotype of them. I use samtools for downstream filter, is there other methods better? thanks
                The samtools SNP calling protocol is a very good starting point. I assume you have a very deep coverage on your samples (since they are bacteria), so you probably want to make the
                varfilter parameters more stringent (start increasing the coverage necessary to call a snp). Do you have any expected mutation rate on your bacterias? insertions?

                Notice the samtools' author has recently released a new version of samtools and pileup has been deprecated. mpileup is recommend now.
                -drd

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                12 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                14 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...