Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • newBioinfo
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 36

    #1

    how to deal with 16S rDNA data form Illumina

    Hi Everyone,
    I am very new in the field of Bioinformatics, I have a sequencing data from Ilumina of 16S r DNA from water. I got the quality score distribution of the data and it lies within 30 -35 range, which means it is a good data to start with. I want to know what will be the next step to deal with this data.
    I am thinkng of doing this:
    1) Blast the data with ribosomal data base

    Can anyone provide me some idea how to start with this data.


    Thanks for any help!!!!!
  • RickBioinf
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 28

    #2
    How many reads do you have? The more reads you have the longer it takes (sometimes even 3 months) so it's probably not a good idea. You should check if you can make your dataset smaller.
    Maybe you should also try to use another program than BLAST, it is slower than alot of different tools, like: https://github.com/csmiller/EMIRGE
    If it still takes a long time let me know, I can help you search for some other things too.

    Good luck.

    Comment

    • wkrhc4mia
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 1

      #3
      Originally posted by newBioinfo View Post
      Hi Everyone,
      I am very new in the field of Bioinformatics, I have a sequencing data from Ilumina of 16S r DNA from water. I got the quality score distribution of the data and it lies within 30 -35 range, which means it is a good data to start with. I want to know what will be the next step to deal with this data.
      I am thinkng of doing this:
      1) Blast the data with ribosomal data base

      Can anyone provide me some idea how to start with this data.


      Thanks for any help!!!!!
      Take a look at QIIME (www.qiime.org, and the overview tutorial there) or mothur (www.mothur.org). Those provide standard pipelines for dealing with 16S sequences. Blasting some of the sequences against a database such as RDP or greengenes is usually part of the pipeline.

      Comment

      • newBioinfo
        Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 36

        #4
        Originally posted by RickBioinf View Post
        How many reads do you have? The more reads you have the longer it takes (sometimes even 3 months) so it's probably not a good idea. You should check if you can make your dataset smaller.
        Maybe you should also try to use another program than BLAST, it is slower than alot of different tools, like: https://github.com/csmiller/EMIRGE
        If it still takes a long time let me know, I can help you search for some other things too.

        Good luck.
        Thanks RickBioinf for the help.
        I have around 78 million reads and I have filtered these reads to 77 million. Now my data has those reads which have no 'N'. I tried blasting the data to non redundant database but it was taking too long. I will try what you have suggested. So, this db has only ribosomal DNA.
        Thanks for the help!!!

        Comment

        • newBioinfo
          Member
          • Mar 2012
          • 36

          #5
          Originally posted by wkrhc4mia View Post
          Take a look at QIIME (www.qiime.org, and the overview tutorial there) or mothur (www.mothur.org). Those provide standard pipelines for dealing with 16S sequences. Blasting some of the sequences against a database such as RDP or greengenes is usually part of the pipeline.
          Thanks wkrhc4mia,
          I am thinking of using mothur, so you mean I do not have to blast the data to any db separately, it will be a part of mothur pipeline.

          Thanks for the help!!!

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            If you run a single blast search, it is going to take a long time. This is where you could break up your initial search file into multiple smaller fragments and then run the searches in parallel (would work best if you have access to a compute cluster).

            There are parallel implementations of blast http://www.mpiblast.org/ that can be useful. Installing and using mpiBLAST is not trivial though .. just a fair warning.

            Originally posted by newBioinfo View Post
            Thanks RickBioinf for the help.
            I tried blasting the data to non redundant database but it was taking too long. I will try what you have suggested. So, this db has only ribosomal DNA.
            Thanks for the help!!!

            Comment

            • fanyucai1
              Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 11

              #7
              There is a software named MEGAN (http://ab.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/software/megan/)
              ,you could use. The reference database you could choose SILVA\Greengene\RDP

              Comment

              • Polecat
                Member
                • Aug 2012
                • 11

                #8
                Becareful if using MEGAN that you don't waste time by doing your blasts against the wrong database.

                MEGAN likes NCBI taxonomy for BLASTN, BLASTX or BLASTP to compare against NCBI-NT, NCBI-NR or genome specifi c databases. MEGAN can also parse fi les generated by the RDP website or the Silva. MEGAN can also parse files in SAM format.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2




                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                41 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
                0 responses
                25 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                74 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                48 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...