Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lletourn
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 63

    #1

    Rarefaction distance explanation

    I have 16s data (target: 96F 1492R) that was run on 454. The results are very good. I used ESpirit and mothur on the data to get Chao1 good's coverage and rarefaction graphs.

    I was just wondering if any one of you knows of a publication/books which goes into details explaining why the distances 0.01, 0.03-0.05, 0.1 are very 'important' as diversity markers.

    I deduced that 0.01 means that the OTUs are of the same species
    0.03-0.05 are of the same family/genus
    0.1 same phylum/class

    But I can't find any clear cut study on those numbers.

    thanks
  • cliffbeall
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 144

    #2
    I think those are just heuristics. I have heard 1% for strain/subspecies and 3% for species, but those definitions are fluid.

    Here is a review:
    Pace, N. R. (2009). "Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects." Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73(4): 565-76.

    Comment

    • lletourn
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 63

      #3
      I know you answered this awhile ago, but thanks a lot, it's exactly the kind of article I was looking for.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...