Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JQL
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 83

    #1

    sequencing QC and metagenomics

    Hi,

    I just started my first metagenomics shot-gun sequencing analysis. I hope I can get some advice here.

    1. QC process: I am looking at removing duplicate sequences and trimming low quality bases, according to this HMP's SOP. Is this adequate? What is considered a good QC practice?

    2. Data analysis: I am first trying MetaPhlAn by Huttenhower's group. Is there any 'standard' procedure/workflow that this community recommends?

    Thanks for your help,
    John
  • fanli
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 197

    #2
    Originally posted by JQL View Post
    1. QC process: I am looking at removing duplicate sequences and trimming low quality bases, according to this HMP's SOP. Is this adequate? What is considered a good QC practice?
    You may want to remove human/host DNA as well. kneaddata from Curtis Huttonhower's group does this, but uses bowtie2's --un-conc output to filter reads, which misses repetitive DNA that doesn't align concordantly. We've taken to manually filtering any read pair that aligns in any fashion to the human reference.

    Originally posted by JQL View Post
    2. Data analysis: I am first trying MetaPhlAn by Huttenhower's group. Is there any 'standard' procedure/workflow that this community recommends?
    There are also k-mer based approaches (e.g. kraken and CLARK) that were recently shown to outperform MetaPhlAn: see here. Generally speaking, I don't think shotgun is as well figured out as 16S, so there is still some exploring to do. You may also be interested in PanPhlAn, ConStrains, etc. that do strain-level profiling.

    We've just gotten into shotgun too, so happy to share any advice.

    Comment

    • JQL
      Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 83

      #3
      Thank you very much for your reply. At this point, any thing will help me get started.

      have a nice weekend,
      John

      Originally posted by fanli View Post
      You may want to remove human/host DNA as well. kneaddata from Curtis Huttonhower's group does this, but uses bowtie2's --un-conc output to filter reads, which misses repetitive DNA that doesn't align concordantly. We've taken to manually filtering any read pair that aligns in any fashion to the human reference.



      There are also k-mer based approaches (e.g. kraken and CLARK) that were recently shown to outperform MetaPhlAn: see here. Generally speaking, I don't think shotgun is as well figured out as 16S, so there is still some exploring to do. You may also be interested in PanPhlAn, ConStrains, etc. that do strain-level profiling.

      We've just gotten into shotgun too, so happy to share any advice.

      Comment

      • bastianwur
        Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 98

        #4
        Other things you'll need to do:
        - assembly, best cross-assembly if you have multiple samples
        - genomic binning (e.g. maxBin)
        - gene prediction (prodigal has a setting for meta, but only bacteria; ncRNAs can be predicted with rnammer, trnascan-SE and rfam)
        - function prediction (via KO, InterproScan, PRIAM, dbCAN, etc)

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          Today, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:56 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        76 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...