Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dannybiofilm
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2017
    • 2

    QIIME vs Mothur vs UPARSE

    Hello,

    I am working on a pipeline to analyze some metabarcoding DNA samples from a MiSeq. I have read multiple papers that all use different programs for OTU clustering. Does anyone have suggestions on programs that work best (QIIME, Mothur, or UPARSE).

    Thanks
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    what kind of metabarcode target? Can your target be aligned? If so, mothur. If not, doesn't matter as much. I like mothur because of many reasons including it's easy to install natively (my datasets are too big to mess with qiime's virtualbox workaround)
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • dannybiofilm
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2017
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks for responding, I am targeting 16S, 18S, and 23S with 3 different primer sets. However, I will be analyzing each of them separately.

      Comment

      • thermophile
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 243

        #4
        Use mothur with the silva alignment. you may need to format the LSU alignment for mothur but there are instructions on the mothur website. Also the mothur forum is fairly active if you have any issues.
        Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        55 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...