Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thurisaz
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 24

    Arabidopsis transcriptome size?

    Hi,

    I'm trying to run saet to correct miscalled reads on our RNA-seq data, but I'm not sure what to use for the refLength ("expected length of the assembled sequence"). Does anybody know what size would be appropriate for the Arabidopsis transcriptome?

    I downloaded the TAIR10 exons, 5' UTR & 3' UTR files and ran them through "grep -v '^>' | wc -m" to come up with a figure around 77 x 10^6 bases, which seems a bit higher (I was expecting around 50-60 x 10⁶ based on ~25,000 genes x 2000bp per gene).

    Any thoughts or experience with this? Is there a reference I've missed which gives a reliable number?
  • usad
    Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 53

    #2
    Hi,

    I reckon you used TAIR10_exon_20101028?
    it seems that identical exons from multiple splice variants are repeated in this file.

    e.g.
    >AT1G01020.1|exon-2 | 274-321 | chr1:8417-8464 REVERSE LENGTH=48
    GGAAATTGCAAGGAAGTAGCAGATGAGTACATCGAGTGTGAACGCATG

    >AT1G01020.2|exon-2 | 274-321 | chr1:8417-8464 REVERSE LENGTH=48
    GGAAATTGCAAGGAAGTAGCAGATGAGTACATCGAGTGTGAACGCATG

    which will increase your number. You could filter this based on the "representative" gene list also provided by TAIR.
    I am unfortunately not familiar with saet.

    Cheers,
    björn

    Comment

    • thurisaz
      Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 24

      #3
      Thanks for pointing that out! Filtering with the representative gene list from TAIR brings the total length down to about 60 x 10⁶ bp, so I guess I'll use that. Hopefully saet isn't too sensitive to this parameter and a +/- 5x10⁶ bp estimate will be good enough...

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...