Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • abakelaar
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 10

    auto_annovar

    can anyone tell me what's wrong


    [abakelaar@iPipeline annovar]$ perl auto_annovar.pl -model recessive 0004_61WDG_s_5 humandb/hg18/ --buildver hg18 NOTICE: the --ver1000g argument is set as '1000g' by default

    NOTICE: Running step 1 with system command <annotate_variation.pl -geneanno -buildver hg18 -dbtype refgene -outfile 0004_61WDG_s_5.step1 0004_61WDG_s_5 humandb/hg18/>
    Can't exec "annotate_variation.pl": No such file or directory at auto_annovar.pl line 131.
    Error running system command: <annotate_variation.pl -geneanno -buildver hg18 -dbtype refgene -outfile 0004_61WDG_s_5.step1 0004_61WDG_s_5 humandb/hg18/>
  • scd
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 2

    #2
    Annovar requires that the annotate_variation.pl script is somewhere in your global execution path.

    What I've done is make a symbolic link in /usr/local/bin that points to the annotate_variation.pl script.

    Use ln -s to do so (http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?ln)

    Comment

    • tmacme
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 3

      #3
      Hey guy,
      When I finished making the "symbolic link" as you indicated , the "Error running system command" message was still there ,with the message "Can't exec "annotate_variation.pl" missed. And now I was so confused.
      [ps] I use Cygwin.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...