Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • huangjun
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 13

    #1

    RNA-seq SNP calling softwore

    Hello everyone,
    Recently, i began to working on RNA-seq analysis. To one species, if i have some assembled transcripts, how can i use this data to SNP calling, could you give me some suggestions or which softwore should i choose?
    Thank you!
  • edge
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 199

    #2
    Hi huangjun,

    Do you figure out the solution for your doubt?
    Currently I'm facing the same problem as well.
    I have a Illumina RNA-seq pair-end read, reference transcriptome.
    However, I have no idea how to get the SNP result from my data set.
    Thanks for any advice.

    Comment

    • figo1019
      Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 32

      #3
      Originally posted by edge View Post
      Hi huangjun,

      Do you figure out the solution for your doubt?
      Currently I'm facing the same problem as well.
      I have a Illumina RNA-seq pair-end read, reference transcriptome.
      However, I have no idea how to get the SNP result from my data set.
      Thanks for any advice.
      Hi edge

      Have you figured it out that how to get the SNP result from RNA seq data. I also want to know.

      regards

      Comment

      • bruce01
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2011
        • 160

        #4
        I have done this with both GATK and SAMtools mpileup (also using VarScan). There is a lot of good help available for each method here on seqAnswers and on the GATK website. GATK is quite fiddly to run as I remember, the SAMtools/VarScan way was easier but does not address the potential issue of realigning data once quality scores have been used to remove data. This is particularly necessary as 'SNPs' may just be bad sequence, or indeed RNA-editing, although the scale of RNA-editing is still not really known...

        For what its worth I did not find much that was useful (I had ~40m reads per sample, ref genome ~3GB). I think looking at alternative splicing might be more worthwhile.

        Comment

        • kopi-o
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 319

          #5
          There is no really good solution for SNP calling from RNA-seq data at this time, as far as I know.

          EDIT: I mean, samtools pileup and GATK can be used, but they were developed for genomic resequencing. RNA-seq shows a much higher variability in read counts from locus to locus, and SNV calling for it is complicated by things like RNA editing (as bruce01 mentioned).

          Comment

          • mgabrielli@partek.com
            Registered Vendor
            • Nov 2009
            • 19

            #6
            Hi,

            Were you aware that Partek Flow can call SNPs from RNA-seq data BOTH by comparing against a reference AND across patient samples!?
            Furthermore Partek can combine SNV detection with expression and perform allele-specific expression.

            Would this help you? You can get your free temporary copy of Partek Flow here:
            User-friendly bioinformatics software for the analysis and visualization of multiomic data.

            Comment

            • raving
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 4

              #7
              Originally posted by bruce01 View Post
              I have done this with both GATK and SAMtools mpileup (also using VarScan). There is a lot of good help available for each method here on seqAnswers and on the GATK website. GATK is quite fiddly to run as I remember, the SAMtools/VarScan way was easier but does not address the potential issue of realigning data once quality scores have been used to remove data. This is particularly necessary as 'SNPs' may just be bad sequence, or indeed RNA-editing, although the scale of RNA-editing is still not really known...

              For what its worth I did not find much that was useful (I had ~40m reads per sample, ref genome ~3GB). I think looking at alternative splicing might be more worthwhile.
              did you mean that realign is necessary for SNPs calling? why?

              Comment

              • bruce01
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 160

                #8
                Yes, recalibration and realignment is necessary using GATK. This is because if a SNP occurs that is not in your reference genome the alignment score will be lower due to an apparent mismatch. However if you recalibrate alignment scores based on a SNP flatfile (vcf) then you can realign and the alignment will have a higher score. The same principle applies not just for SNPs but for indels, rearrangements. That is the theory anyway, and it is also why GATK is the 'golden standard' for SNP calling.

                Comment

                • BobbyKing
                  Junior Member
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 2

                  #9
                  Tutorial website

                  Hi,

                  I have put together a tutorial website with four core tutorials on it, RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, Genome assembly, and SNP calling that may be of use to you.

                  This website was created to share bioinformatics tutorials and create a dynamic learning environment that does not become dated, PDF contributions welcome and there are four core tutorials available. We would be interested to get some feedback.

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • kinpict.com
                    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                    by kinpict.com
                    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                    Today, 06:37 PM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                    by SEQadmin2





                    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                  0 responses
                  27 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                  0 responses
                  35 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                  2 responses
                  56 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post kinpict.com  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                  0 responses
                  175 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...