Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • egunth
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 4

    Cufflinks not IDing transcripts correctly

    Hi all,

    I'm using Cufflinks to calculate transcript abundances on my human RNA seq data but it seems to be having a problem matching transcripts in my data to their correct gene ID's from a reference GTF. I generated a RefSeq hg18.gtf annotation file from the UCSC table browser and loaded that for into cufflinks for all of my samples. About 60% of the loci it processes are labelled with their RefSeq ID, but many of them simply have a generic "CUFF.1" ID attached to them, even though the associated genomic loci are present in my annotation.

    For example, This is what I see in my genes.fpkm_tracking file for one locus

    CUFF.2 - - CUFF.2 - - chr1:4224-19255 - - OK 47.7646 38.9667 56.5625

    But in my annotation that locus is clearly listed as WASH7P

    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 4225 4692 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 4833 4901 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 5659 5810 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 6470 6628 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 6721 6918 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 7096 7231 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 7469 7605 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 7778 7924 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 8131 8229 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 14601 14754 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";
    chr1 hg18_refFlat exon 19184 19233 0.000000 - . gene_id "WASH7P"; transcript_id "WASH7P";

    Am I using the wrong format annotation file for this?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
107 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
125 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...