Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    edgeR multiple testing

    Hi everybody,

    I've searched a lot but have not found a definitive discussion on this yet.

    I'm using edgeR on a human dataset with 3-4 replicates per group.

    When I follow the edgeR tutorial and export (see code below) I get this:

    Code:
    dispersion = estimateCommonDisp(DGE_timepoints)
    de.com <- exactTest(dispersion, c("healthy-control","disease"))
    out_tags1 = topTags(de.com, n=length(de.com))
    write.table(out_tags1, "out_unadjusted_pvalue.csv", sep="\t")

    gene table.logConc table.logFC table.PValue table.FDR adjust.method
    ENSG00000250644 -20.0951079864 -11.2384935084 1.19615633839674e-08 0.0002112173 BH
    ENSG00000176994 -33.1995219248 -33.633064638 1.27917856074067e-07 0.0009680458 BH

    Note that adjust method is BH, but I am not sure if Pvalue adjustment was carried out by default. In the manual it seems to suggest a further Pvalue adjustment is needed:

    Code:
    # P values adjusted by Benjani-Hochberg method, single column
    out_tags_adjusted = p.adjust(de.com$table$p.value, method="BH")
    
    write.table(out_tags_adjusted, "out_adjusted_pvalue.csv", sep="\t")
    However, the two top results above then get an "adjusted" Pvalue of 1 and 0.3 respectively, and virtually no hits are significantly differently regulated.

    I guess that the initial step is sufficient to implement multiple testing.
    Comments?
  • Dario1984
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 166

    #2
    You don't need to do any more adjustment. The adjusted values are in the column which is called 'table.FDR'.

    Comment

    • colindaven
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 417

      #3
      Ah I see. Thanks for the help!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      106 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...