Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrbig
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 2

    #1

    mapping total RNA to a subset of the genome

    I'm interested in the differential expression of organellar genes (i.e. chloroplast and mitochondrial genes) in a particular plant species under salt treatment vs fresh water treatment in two tissue types (leaf and root). We generated four paired-end EST datasets from total RNA (i.e. RNA from all three plant genomes):

    1. leaf-sample with salt water
    2. leaf-sample with fresh water
    3. root-sample with salt water
    4. root-sample with fresh water


    Unfortunately, no technical or biological replicates were made.

    The organellar genomes of this plant species have been published. However, the nuclear genome is not yet available.

    So I have mapped the datasets onto the organellar gene coding sequences. I then counted the number of reads that map to each gene. Here's what some of the results look like:

    LEAF:
    gene salt no-salt
    psbA 30856 1882
    matK 294 62
    rbcL 12472 3547
    atpB 525034 497024
    atpE 259993 280664
    ndhC 4172 2408
    ndhK 11702 7912
    ndhJ 9439 6931
    .
    .


    ROOT:
    gene salt no-salt
    psbA 133 69
    matK 17 4
    rbcL 297 428
    atpB 12755 16277
    atpE 9011 11622
    ndhC 102 175
    ndhK 463 548
    ndhJ 541 511
    .
    .


    My question is, what sort of statistical test or normalization do I need to perform to show the effect of the salt given that (a) I have no biological replicates and (b) I have mapped total RNA reads (including nuclear reads!) against a subset of the genome (the chloroplast and mitochondria)?

    Any help will be very much appreciated. Cheers.
  • mrbig
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 2

    #2
    The question is ... what proportion of chloroplast to mitochondrial to nuclear reads is there within each dataset? And no doubt the proportion of reads will be different between each dataset.

    Would a Fisher's exact test help? If so, how can I apply this?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2




      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
      Today, 06:46 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
    0 responses
    14 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    67 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    47 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...