Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • foxriverlin
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 13

    #1

    cuffdiff: # SD genes come down with more replicates

    Hi All,

    I am doing differential gene analysis on a non-model organism. The draft genome and annotation has been around us for a while but haven't published yet. The RNA-seq data we have three sample (5 reps for first two and 4 reps for last one)

    First I tried in this way (followed the nature protocol): cufflinks assembly RNA-seq into single transcript for each replicate without GTF--cuffmerge single transcript with ref-gtf into merged. gtf--cuffdiff 3 samples based on merged.gft. But we got too much on gene level. We just annotated 8307 genes currently but the cuffdiff output gives us

    126579 genes
    136248 isoforms
    133271 TSS
    8659 CDS
    126579 promoters
    133271 splicing
    7428 relCDS

    We suspect it is because the cufflinks assembly too much novel transcript. Then I reran the cufflinks with --GTF and with --GTF guide. The cuffmerge step is the same with previous attempt. Then I used cuffcompare to compare the merged.gtf to ref.gtf. The two approach yield two different result: (1) in the --GTF approach, the *.tmap file gives us

    j 201
    = 8278

    which is pretty reasonable because program will ignore alignments not structurally compatible with any reference transcript. (2) But in the GTF guide approach I still got tons of unmatches in the *.tmap.

    u 106326
    j 4235
    x 3
    o 51
    = 7210

    Also I got only few SD genes in all of the attempts, less then 30. The expectation is around 3,000. The number of SD genes only comes up to 300 when I put only one replicate for each sample. There is no difference when I use cuffdiff1.3 compared with cuffdiff2.0.

    My question is how can I get the total # of genes down in the combined transcript and get the # of SD genes up in the cuffdiff result.

    Any suggestion and comment is welcome.

    Liu

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:59 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
32 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
171 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...