Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • drosoform
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 6

    More diff expressed genes than transcripts with Cuffdiff

    Dear all,

    I am using newest version of Tophat -> Cuffdiff. I have two biological conditions, and 3 replicates for both conditions.

    My results show ~200 something differentially expressed genes, but only 50 or so differentially expressed transcripts.

    How is it that there are more differentially expressed genes than transcripts? For a gene to be deemed differentially expressed, wouldn't at least one of its transcripts have to be differentially expressed too? So I would have expect more transcripts than genes to be listed as differentially expressed, especially since some genes with multiple isoforms that are diff. expressed may sort of cancel out each other when looking at overall gene expression.

    I noticed in the recent protocol published by Trapnell et al, they also showed about half as many transcripts as genes to be differentially expressed, in their example data set.



    So there must be an explanation for this, I just don't know what it is. Please, could anyone explain? Sorry if this is something basic - I am very new to RNAseq!
  • sdriscoll
    I like code
    • Sep 2009
    • 436

    #2
    i think it's due to their variance modeling. i've had single isoform genes not called significant in the genes output but significant in the isoforms output. there should be no difference there.
    /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

    Comment

    • sepulveda
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 10

      #3
      I have noticed this problem, does anyone have a better answer? It does not make sense.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      103 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...