Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cah
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 1

    #1

    FFPE RNA library prep and capture

    We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

    Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

    I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

    Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

    In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

    Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
    Has anyone tried this?
    Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
    Last edited by cah; 10-10-2012, 12:50 PM.
  • veronica
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 3

    #2
    Originally posted by cah View Post
    We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

    Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

    I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

    Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

    In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

    Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
    Has anyone tried this?
    Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
    For what I have heard Illumina's R&D is doing something like that.. but it is second hand news...

    Comment

    • Him26
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 20

      #3
      Originally posted by cah View Post
      We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

      Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

      I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

      Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

      In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

      Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
      Has anyone tried this?
      Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
      Hi, I am interested in performing RNAseq on FFPE samples. I see lots of papers on google but I was wondering if you would share your experience. Thank you.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...