Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FFPE RNA library prep and capture

    We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

    Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

    I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

    Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

    In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

    Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
    Has anyone tried this?
    Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
    Last edited by cah; 10-10-2012, 12:50 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by cah View Post
    We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

    Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

    I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

    Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

    In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

    Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
    Has anyone tried this?
    Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
    For what I have heard Illumina's R&D is doing something like that.. but it is second hand news...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by cah View Post
      We are looking for a way to improve the data we obtain from FFPE RNA samples that we are sequencing (Illumina).

      Knowing the FFPE samples are degraded, we assume poly A tails are not necessarily present on the mRNA for these samples which is effectively reducing the coverage we see. We are looking for an effective work around.

      I've read some positive results about Ribozero and DSN normalization, but am told that these methods have been tested here without great results.

      Since we are working with FFPE samples, we were thinking that we would not do any fragmentation or poly A selection and simply start with cDNA synthesis, make ds cDNA and then capture what we are interested in. The problem is we are interested in as much of the whole transcriptome that is there. We are looking at using an Agilent SureSelect kit, but they don't make a Whole Transcriptome RNA capture kit. They do make a kinome kit and custom kits, but custom could be expensive and time consuming.

      In theory, why wouldn't the Agilent SureSelect All Exon (DNA) capture kit work on a ds cDNA library? It seems like the baits that are specific to the Exome, should be complimentary to the specific strands of mRNA that we made cDNA out of and leave the rest behind.

      Maybe I'm missing something obvious though.
      Has anyone tried this?
      Does anyone have any recommendations/hints/advice for doing this?
      Hi, I am interested in performing RNAseq on FFPE samples. I see lots of papers on google but I was wondering if you would share your experience. Thank you.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Recent Advances in Sequencing Analysis Tools
        by seqadmin


        The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...
        Today, 07:48 AM
      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin




        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
        04-22-2024, 07:01 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, Today, 07:17 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 05-02-2024, 08:06 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-30-2024, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-29-2024, 10:49 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X