Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    RNA-seq sequencing depth

    Hi everybody,

    I've several questions about sequencing depth and RNA-seq. So, what is the minimal read count (in the raw data) to have a good view of :

    1. gene expression ?
    2. Differential splicing ?
    3. Low expressed transcripts (like lncRNA) ?
    4. Fusion gene ?

    I read that 100M is a minimum for fusion gene ? Is that correct ?
    I want to do 2x50bp strand-specific libraires and sequenced them on a HiSeq 2000. Is 50bp enough to find accurately fusion gene ?

    Thanks,

    N.
  • TonyBrooks
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 303

    #2
    A good place to start

    Comment

    • woodydon
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 52

      #3
      50 bp is not enough. You should try 200bp or longer.

      Woody

      Comment

      • NicoBxl
        not just another member
        • Aug 2010
        • 264

        #4
        Hi guys,

        I did 2x100 finally, and it worked pretty well

        Comment

        • puggie
          Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 52

          #5
          I'm glad it work out for you Depending on what you are looking for depth is something to consider.

          Out of curiosity how did you sequence, i.e. reads/sample?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...