Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ParthavJailwala
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 27

    Cuffmerge related query

    I have a query regarding what samples should be merged using cuffmerge, when you have multiple phenotypes (each with replicates). Lets say my mouse dataset comprises of one set of RNA-seq samples resulting from mutation of gene X, while there is another set resulting from mutation of gene Y. So the samples are:

    Samples:
    GeneXmutation (3 reps)
    GeneYmutation (3 reps)
    B6ctrl (3 reps)
    MixedCtrl (3 reps)

    The cuffdiff comparisons of interest are:

    Phenotype A: GeneXmutation (3 reps) vs B6ctrl (3 reps)......[GeneX mutation is on the B6 background]
    Phenotype B: GeneYmutation (3 reps) vs MixedCtrl (3 reps)....[GeneY mutation is on the Mixed background]

    I have the cufflinks assemblies for each of the 12 samples. My question is: should the cufflinks assemblies (transcripts.gtf) of all the samples above be merged one time using cuffmerge (all 12 samples as above) OR I should be running two cuffmerges: one for Phenotype A comparison and other for Phenotype B comparison? Does one approach over the another make a huge difference?

    Thanks

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    Yesterday, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
8 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...