Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jtipton
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 1

    Grouping non replicates in Cuffdiff

    I'm new to bioinformatics and I have what seems like a weird task. I have 7 samples of a fungus with 2 replicates each. I want to compare 1 of these samples vs all 6 of the rest. However I'm not sure how to set this up.

    Would I basically do cuffdiff -L group1, group2 sample1r1,sample1r2 sample2r1,sample2r2,sample3r1,sample3r2... and put them all in the same group and treat them all like replicates? This doesn't seem right, but I haven't found a better way to group them.
  • jparsons
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 62

    #2
    it depends on what you mean by "vs all 6 of the rest".

    If you want to treat them like replicates, then yes, you do it like you suggested.

    If you want to compare vs each of the other 6 individually, you want to treat each of the 7 as its own separate group, label each of them individually, and then filter your results to include only group 1 vs 6-7 (there will be data for each pairwise comparison)

    You'd want to do something like -l group1,group2(through7) sample1r1,1r2 sample2r1,2r2(through7).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...