Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sjm
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 27

    #1

    Tophat/Cufflinks/RNASeq short-read aligners and pseudogenes

    I've had good success with Tophat and Cufflinks for analysis of RNASeq and computation of expression changes between samples - thanks to all the authors! I'm pretty new to this game (<6 months experience with NGS, aligners and UNIX) but these have been helpful programs.

    I have an unresolved issue, though; how do these algorithms assign sequence reads/bundles which map to identical areas of the genome? (mouse genome in this case.) This may be a question that is applicable to all similar alignment software. As an example, the following transcripts (EMBL nomenclature):

    ENSMUST00000022634 (chromosome 14) - the 'authentic' gene transcript
    ENSMUST00000101577 (chromosome 12) - a pseudogene, whose transcript may or may not be translated

    are ~1 kb transcripts that are virtually identical (just a few mismatched nucleotides between them). The cufflinks transcripts.gtf, .tmap and .tracking files show that different RPKM values are being generated for each of these two transcripts, and the CUFF.xxx bundles assigned to them are numbered differently.

    I'm curious as to whether sequence reads/bundles which are identical are being randomly assigned as the chr14 or the chr12 transcript; or whether they are being assigned to both loci?

    Thanks for any insight.
  • lmf_bill
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 36

    #2
    I think your question is relative to multiple hits of one read. It one hard work. Some recent papers published in Bioinformatics have put forward some approaches to resolve this problem, you can check it.

    Comment

    • sjm
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 27

      #3
      Thanks for the advice - I'll check recent Bioinformatics issues.

      I would still be interested to hear from anyone who has insight into how Tophat/Cufflinks (specifically) deals with this problem... although I realize only the coders might know this.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      67 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      47 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...