Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mali Salmon
    Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 24

    random hexamer bias

    Hello list
    Do you know if HTSeq/DESeq or edgeR account for the random hexamer bias?
    If not, what would be an easy way to normalize for that bias prior of running DESeq?
    Thanks
    Mali
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    They don't, but normally the bias is more or less the same in all of your samples. You can, however, have a look at the cqn package, which is geared more toward GC bias, but could probably be used to deal with this issue (you can't use it with DESeq, but DESeq2 would work).

    Comment

    • Mali Salmon
      Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 24

      #3
      Thanks dpryan for your reply.
      The reason I am interested with normalizing for that bias is because I have two different patterns of this bias in my samples.
      I looked at the cqn package and as you said it deals with GC bias. I don't see how it would work for the hexamer bias (do you have by a change a sample R code that would do the trick?)
      Thanks again
      Mali

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        Today, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      8 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      29 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...