Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sebastiano
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 5

    Bootstrapping RNA-Seq data

    hi all

    I have an RNA_Seq dataset (FPKM values) obtained from the ENCODE Caltech datasets for K562 cells.
    I have 6 different lists of genes and I want to show that the expression values of my panel of genes is not random...therefore I decided to use R and perform bootstrapping.

    bootstrap, for what I know, requires normally distributed data. my RNA-Seq data are not normally distributed and they are strongly skewed on the left.

    I used BoxCox transformation
    Code:
    box.cox.powers(RNA_Seq[,2])
    to normalize them.

    I obtained a negative value (-0.03701075 to be precise) and raised my FPKM values to that. I then used
    Code:
    scale()
    to obtain the z-scores and see if the z-scores of my genes are bigger/smaller than +/-1.96.
    that's because I am interested to see if my panel of genes is more highly expressed -or it has a lower expression- than what you would expect by chance.

    However...and here's the problem...the values with the HIGHEST FPKM became those with the LOWEST z-score and vice versa since I elevated to a negative number...I understand why this happens mathematically, however, I don't really know how to handle the bootstrap now because the data show the exact opposite of what I would reasonably expect!

    so...how would you guys handle bootstrap on RNA-Seq data to test my genes of interest?

    thanks!!
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Originally posted by Sebastiano View Post
    bootstrap, for what I know, requires normally distributed data.
    No, quite the opposite!

    If your data is normal or you think it can be transformed to approximate normality with the Box-Cox transformation, then you should use conventional parametric statistics and not the bootstrap.

    The whole point of the bootstrap is that it allows to perform inference when you cannot or do not want to make any assumptions about your data's parametric distribution.

    Without wanting to sound dismissive: Given that you decided to try a bootstrap for all the wrong reasons, may I suggest you go back to your favorite textbook and refresh your memory before proceeding? ;-)

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    9 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    52 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    110 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...