Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zapages
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 98

    Cuffdiff2 skipped genes

    Hi everyone,

    I have weird problem. I followed the Tuxedo pipeline it has been working well so far. I was conducting CummeRbund and in my heatmap visualization, I noticed one of the genes of interest was not present. I went back to all my Cufflinks and Cuffmerge folders and saw that the genes of interest or location of the gene was present there. But in cuffdiff2's gene_exp.diff file, it did not have gene loci present.

    For example it went from:

    Gene10355
    Gene10357

    Gene10356 was skipped.

    What did I do wrong to have one of my gene of interest missing in my gene_exp.diff.

    Here's my pipeline:

    Trimmomatic > Tophat 2 with Ensembl GTF and Fasta > Cufflinks 2.0.2 with Ensembl Fasta (fragment bias) and GTF > Cuffmerge2 2.0.2 with Ensembl GTF > Cuffdiff2 2.0.2 with Ensembl Fasta and merged_w_refs.gtf file from Cuffmerge2 2.0.2_Fragment(False discovery rate of 0.01 and multiple hits correction) > CummeRbund for heatmap

    Also I have 2 replicates for Organ A and 3 replicates for Organ B.

    Thank you in advance.

    EDIT: Looking at the Cufflinks files, the expression (FPKM) of the gene is high in Organ A and literally 0 in Organ B. Would this lead to this problem?

    EDIT2: I still not get the skipped gene even when I take out multi hit correction or taking away the fasta file.

    EDIT: In the Cuffmerge file: The first 2 matches are Cuff (Organ A) and the second 2 matches are the actual gene location (Organ B). Could that cause it not work properly for Cuffdiff2?

    This is very strange and I did not have this occur before. Could someone kindly help me on this. Thank you. I would really appreciate it.

    -Zapages
    Last edited by Zapages; 02-07-2014, 08:50 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...