Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rakscalloni
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 16

    ShortRead output

    Hello everyone!

    I am a very beginner in RNASeq data analysis and used ShortRead to assess the reads quality. However, I need some help to understand/interpret the ShortRead output. Therefore, I would like to ask you for basic literature about parameters commonly used to certify the sequencing quality. I guess this kind of reading could help me with the ShortRead output...

    Thanks
  • blancha
    Senior Member
    • May 2013
    • 367

    #2
    Why not use FASTQC? The output is easy to interpret.

    Or do you have a reason to use ShortRead over FASTQC?

    Comment

    • rakscalloni
      Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 16

      #3
      Originally posted by blancha View Post
      Why not use FASTQC? The output is easy to interpret.

      Or do you have a reason to use ShortRead over FASTQC?
      Hi Blancha!

      Actually, I am following the pipeline proposed by this article "Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor", and the authors suggested ShortRead to check the reads quality. As I started with RNA-Seq analysis two weeks ago, I am not fully informed about the programs options.

      I intend to learn how to use both ShortRead and FASTQC...

      Thank you for your help

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...