Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • buthercup_ch
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 41

    5S rRNA contamination

    Hi everyone.

    I'm new in this world of NGS and HTS and I need some help in understanding some issues.
    I've just received a set of sequences from RNA-Seq in Illumina Platform. I personally prepared the cDNA library to be used in the sequencing reaction, starting from total RNA from gram-negative bacterial.
    To get rid of the rRNA I used RiboZero kit (for gram-negative bacteria) and the treatment was really successful, except for low amounts of 5S rRNA that still remains. But it seems that is something normal using this kit.
    The expert from the Genome Platform and my supervisor agreed in continuing with the sequencing, and it turns out that the final data contains "5S rRNA contamination"…, what is not a surprise, of course.
    I use CLC Workbench Genomics to run the data analysis. After QC analysis, sequencing seemed to be of very good quality. And after trimming, I obtained about 40% of unmapped reads, what seems reasonable. The mapping was against a Reference Genome downloaded from NCBI, containing only the chromosome.
    I run the analysis to compare "non-specific matches" (max hits = 10) and "specific matches" (max hits =1)… and in both cases I obtained a huge amount of reads that map with a small region, of about 119bp of the 5S rRNA subunit of 1 of the 5 operons that exists.
    Running a RNA-Seq analysis against the same genome, but using "rRNA" track, instead "genes" or "CDS" tracks, I obtained a mapping of about 18% to the same region.

    The question is the following. Should I be worried about the accuracy of the RNA-Seq experiment due to this contamination of 5S? Should I repeat the sequencing reaction after getting rid completely of the remaining 5S rRNA in the samples? Or in contrast, could I use the expression value obtained if I just eliminate tRNAs and rRNAs from the Reference Genome (running the analysis agains a multicast file of all genes gave almost the same result than the aligned genome)

    Thank you very much in advance
  • buthercup_ch
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 41

    #2
    An additional information:
    Comparing the analysis against "all genes" (including CDS, tRNA and rRNA genes) or "only CDS", the % of not mapped reads rise from about 40 to about 60%…, logical if we take into account about 18% mapping if we only consider rRNA gene sequences to perform the analysis.
    But…., is that 60% not mapped reads to high????

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    41 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    102 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    123 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    114 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...