Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sbdk82
    Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 26

    Cuffdiff output

    I am running BWA->cufflink for differential gene expression and the cuffdiff output contains many repeated gene_ids. For example:

    HTML Code:
    test_id	 gene_id	 gene	locus	sample_1 	 sample_2 	 status 	value_1	value_2	log2(fold_change)	 test_stat	 p_value	 q_value	 significant
    XLOC_000665	XLOC_000665	Traes_1AL_34404D5D8	IWGSC_CSS_1AL_scaff_3881073:2596-3747	q3	q5	OK	42.1649	2.81737	-3.90362	-8.49777	5.00E-05	0.00921445	yes
    XLOC_000665	XLOC_000665	Traes_1AL_34404D5D8	IWGSC_CSS_1AL_scaff_3881073:2596-3747	q4	q5	OK	16.8182	2.81737	-2.5776	-5.45754	0.00025	0.0386488	yes
    Can anyone explain why there are repeats like this?

    Also, I need to use BLAST against similar plant species to find information about the genes which are differentially expressed. I am not able to understand the "locus" column. In the above example, the locus is IWGSC_CSS_1AL_scaff_3881073:2596-3747. In the reference file there is a sequence associated with IWGSC_CSS_1AL_scaff_3881073. Do I need to select the subsequence starting from location 2596 to 3747 for BLAST?
  • yehudithasin
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 14

    #2
    Hi sbdk.

    Cuffdiff outputs a line for each ID, for each comparison.
    In the example you posted the first line is comparison between q3 and q5, and the second is between q4 and q5 for the same gene.
    Yu
    Yu

    Comment

    • sbdk82
      Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 26

      #3
      Thanks Yu !!

      Actually I have two samples of data with three replicates in each sample. Thus I have 6 fasta files. So each data file represented by qi (i = 1,2 ..6) ? I used cufflink and then cuffmerge before using cuffdiff.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...